VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4
FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 91
  1. Captures & Restoration lollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Italy
    Search Comp PM
    No more gaps in the histogram (still some accumulation for dark levels):

    Click image for larger version

Name:	new.png
Views:	506
Size:	918.8 KB
ID:	84625

    I prefer the default values in term of general look, but is a personal taste. You can change the parameters/levels as you prefere in post-processing. Use the procamp only to stay inside the capturable range (and in a reasonable "good" overall look).

    Click image for larger version

Name:	new2.png
Views:	498
Size:	1.94 MB
ID:	84626

    Now you should have all the elements for a good capture. Enjoy your captures!!!
    Quote Quote  
  2. Image
    [Attachment 84627 - Click to enlarge]


    Your darks are partially clipped. Clipped video can't be recovered in post. Perhaps increase the brightness a few notches (2...4 steps) for capturing.

    Edit: oops, lollo has already commented.
    Last edited by Sharc; 4th Jan 2025 at 10:07.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Originally Posted by Sharc View Post
    Image
    [Attachment 84627 - Click to enlarge]


    Your darks are partially clipped. Clipped video can't be recovered in post. Perhaps increase the brightness a few notches (2...4 steps) for capturing.

    Edit: oops, lollo has already commented.
    Originally Posted by lollo View Post
    No more gaps in the histogram (still some accumulation for dark levels):

    Image
    [Attachment 84625 - Click to enlarge]


    I prefer the default values in term of general look, but is a personal taste. You can change the parameters/levels as you prefere in post-processing. Use the procamp only to stay inside the capturable range (and in a reasonable "good" overall look).

    Image
    [Attachment 84626 - Click to enlarge]


    Now you should have all the elements for a good capture. Enjoy your captures!!!
    Thanks both for help! So far with every tape I’ve tried to capture, I see horizontal lines at the bottom regardless of the VCR I use. Is this normal?

    Image
    [Attachment 84628 - Click to enlarge]
    Quote Quote  
  4. Originally Posted by tko4 View Post
    Thanks both for help! So far with every tape I’ve tried to capture, I see horizontal lines at the bottom regardless of the VCR I use. Is this normal?

    Image
    [Attachment 84628 - Click to enlarge]
    Yes, this is normal for tape captures. It is called "head switching noise". If it annoys you can just crop it off in post. Same for the left an right small black pillars. Just take care to keep the aspect ratio intact when cropping and/or resizing.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Australia-PAL Land
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by Sharc
    Your darks are partially clipped. Clipped video can't be recovered in post. Perhaps increase the brightness a few notches (2...4 steps) for capturing.
    @tk04, you can see the "too-dark" clipping on your VDub histogram in post #30. The Brightness (left end) is hard up against the limiter. Increase the brightness until the edge just starts to move right (in my experience, it's best to have just a slight bunch-up on the limit, not as much as yours). After you've done that, increase the contrast to move the right end further to the right. Don't go too far though, and also visually check really bright areas to make sure they are not being "whited-out".
    Last edited by Alwyn; 4th Jan 2025 at 19:02.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Originally Posted by Alwyn View Post
    Originally Posted by Sharc
    Your darks are partially clipped. Clipped video can't be recovered in post. Perhaps increase the brightness a few notches (2...4 steps) for capturing.
    @tk04, you can see the "too-dark" clipping on your VDub histogram in post #30. The Brightness (left end) is hard up against the limiter. Increase the brightness until the edge just starts to move right (in my experience, it's best to have just a slight bunch-up on the limit, not as much as yours). After you've done that, increase the contrast to move the right end further to the right. Don't go too far though, and also visually check really bright areas to make sure they are not being "whited-out".
    I increased the brightness a few notches as @Sharc suggested and slightly increased the contrast.

    Histogram:
    Image
    [Attachment 84641 - Click to enlarge]


    What I was using (129 Brightness is just after the red limit):
    Image
    [Attachment 84644 - Click to enlarge]


    Isn't the purpose to stay withing the Y=16? Sorry If I'm asking a dumb question I'm new into this.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Australia-PAL Land
    Search Comp PM
    Isn't the purpose to stay withing the Y=16?
    Yes, but the numbers in the Proc Amp don't relate to the 16-235 limits as far am I am aware. They're just random values which change with every digitiser (as you can see from Lollo's version of the Live2).

    In your last example, it looks too dark to me. The boy's shirt looks like it is white but it is quite dim. And I still don't like that vertical left edge. I reckon you could crank up the brightness more, as well as probably some more contrast. There is a yellow haze over the whole video, but I do think it's still a bit dark.

    Are you into AVISynth? Because you could confirm the levels using an AVISynth histogram (as Lollo and Sharc have done above), or post a short sample of that last one for us to check.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Originally Posted by Alwyn View Post
    Isn't the purpose to stay withing the Y=16?
    Yes, but the numbers in the Proc Amp don't relate to the 16-235 limits as far am I am aware. They're just random values which change with every digitiser (as you can see from Lollo's version of the Live2).

    In your last example, it looks too dark to me. The boy's shirt looks like it is white but it is quite dim. And I still don't like that vertical left edge. I reckon you could crank up the brightness more, as well as probably some more contrast. There is a yellow haze over the whole video, but I do think it's still a bit dark.

    Are you into AVISynth? Because you could confirm the levels using an AVISynth histogram (as Lollo and Sharc have done above), or post a short sample of that last one for us to check.
    I'm not an expert but it seems the histogram from AVISynth is pretty close.

    Image
    [Attachment 84650 - Click to enlarge]


    Image
    [Attachment 84651 - Click to enlarge]
    Quote Quote  
  9. Originally Posted by lollo View Post
    No more gaps in the histogram (still some accumulation for dark levels)
    Originally Posted by Sharc View Post
    Your darks are partially clipped. Clipped video can't be recovered in post. Perhaps increase the brightness a few notches (2...4 steps) for capturing.
    Are gaps generally a bad thing? I increased the brightness a few notches to 135 but it moves slightly away from the limit.

    Image
    [Attachment 84652 - Click to enlarge]
    Quote Quote  
  10. Capturing Memories dellsam34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Member Since 2005, Re-joined in 2016
    Search PM
    I wouldn't worry about histograms, Adjust levels for the most important part of the frame, If you are so anal about the overall frame just make sure there is no blowout on whites and no losing details in darks, I've never used histograms, though, I'm not advising against them.
    Quote Quote  
  11. I found something in VirtualDub2, I checked the 'Capture pin' and the compression quality was set to 1.000. After changing it to 0.000 the histogram no longer shows any gaps.

    1.000:
    Image
    [Attachment 84654 - Click to enlarge]


    0.000:
    Image
    [Attachment 84655 - Click to enlarge]
    Last edited by tko4; 5th Jan 2025 at 15:03.
    Quote Quote  
  12. You shouldn't arrange the waveform and the histogram stacked horizontally. The histogram will include the waveform picture in its statistics.
    (You clearly see in the histogram the spike representing the brown vertical bars of the waveform monitor.)

    For tape captures you need not worry much about gaps or spikes in the histogram. It would matter more for high quality sources where it may contribute to color banding in flat areas. When you do some denoising in post or add a tiny bit of grain the histogram will become smooth anyway.

    P.S. I am wondering where the hard clipping of the darks originates from. Brightness or contrast procamp tweaks seems not to mitigate it. It is still there even after cropping off any borders. Maybe it's baked into the source or comes from the VCR or from the capture device (?). Just speculating.....
    Last edited by Sharc; 5th Jan 2025 at 17:54.
    Quote Quote  
  13. Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Australia-PAL Land
    Search Comp PM
    I like the histogram across the top, so you can see what part of the image is causing the blowouts or darkness; you can then decide to either ignore or make a correction.

    Code:
    TurnRight().Histogram().TurnLeft()#Puts histogram across top
    Quote Quote  
  14. Originally Posted by Alwyn View Post
    I like the histogram across the top, so you can see what part of the image is causing the blowouts or darkness; you can then decide to either ignore or make a correction.

    Code:
    TurnRight().Histogram().TurnLeft()#Puts histogram across top
    Thanks!

    Originally Posted by Sharc View Post
    You shouldn't arrange the waveform and the histogram stacked horizontally. The histogram will include the waveform picture in its statistics.
    (You clearly see in the histogram the spike representing the brown vertical bars of the waveform monitor.)

    For tape captures you need not worry much about gaps or spikes in the histogram. It would matter more for high quality sources where it may contribute to color banding in flat areas. When you do some denoising in post or add a tiny bit of grain the histogram will become smooth anyway.

    P.S. I am wondering where the hard clipping of the darks originates from. Brightness or contrast procamp tweaks seems not to mitigate it. It is still there even after cropping off any borders. Maybe it's baked into the source or comes from the VCR or from the capture device (?). Just speculating.....
    Sample from a different tape:
    Image
    [Attachment 84667 - Click to enlarge]
    Quote Quote  
  15. ^^^^
    This looks fine.
    Quote Quote  
  16. Originally Posted by lollo View Post
    I suspect you do not use in edit mode and D3R off
    Should "D3R" be on or off?
    Quote Quote  
  17. Captures & Restoration lollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Italy
    Search Comp PM
    Off with edit mode, on if not in edit mode (because the image is smoothed and some small "enhancement" does not hurt).

    First combination is preferable, but always experiment with your source.
    Quote Quote  
  18. And if both are on, what would be the result? Or would they counteract each other?
    Quote Quote  
  19. Captures & Restoration lollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Italy
    Search Comp PM
    Oversharpening (the noise) and enhanced halos
    Quote Quote  
  20. Okay, so even when you started in one of your older threads "JVC S-VHS settings for capture (again)" that edit "off" was better, in the end the conclusion (for JVC) is:
    > Edit on
    > B.E.S.T on
    > TBC/DNR on
    > D3R off
    Quote Quote  
  21. Captures & Restoration lollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Italy
    Search Comp PM
    Yes.

    If you do not plan any restoration you can use
    > Edit off
    > B.E.S.T on
    > TBC/DNR on
    > D3R on
    which gives a cleaner raw captured image (that was the sense of my old post) but suffers of higher ghosting at scene change.
    Quote Quote  
  22. Originally Posted by lollo View Post
    If you do not plan any restoration
    Do you have a thread by any chance that covers the restoration process, or can you outline the steps you usually take?

    I have to say, I usually prefer a more grainy image over a cleaned-up one. It gives me the feeling of more details present.
    What I'm definitely interested in is how to balance the colors of a capture.
    Quote Quote  
  23. Captures & Restoration lollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Italy
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by Name View Post
    Do you have a thread by any chance that covers the restoration process, or can you outline the steps you usually take?
    There are many in the forum; you can find some basic example also in my Youtube channel.

    Originally Posted by Name View Post
    I have to say, I usually prefer a more grainy image over a cleaned-up one. It gives me the feeling of more details present.
    Yes, it's always the same difficult balance between "clean" picture (denoise) and "natural look" picture (grain).

    Originally Posted by Name View Post
    What I'm definitely interested in is how to balance the colors of a capture.
    For serious color correction, a NLE like Davinci Resolve is more performant than AviSynth, but the last has its nice features.
    Quote Quote  
  24. Hello,
    Hopefully the author of the topic will not mind me hijacking his thread - but I'm using exactly the same set-up, so Hauppauge USB-Live2, Amarec TV 3.10, Lagarith Codec and Windows 10.

    When I try to start recording, I get a message:
    "The frame rate of the video capture card does not suit a present value."
    Neither recording nor a live function functions normally."

    Then it seems to be recording correctly, but I only tried short clips for now.
    Does anyone know what the issue could be and what it could result in? Thank You.
    Quote Quote  
  25. Captures & Restoration lollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Italy
    Search Comp PM
    Never had that message. Inside menues AmarecTV -> "Recording" -> "Video File Setting" set "Frame rate" to 999 fps to let the Capture Card settings take control on it.
    Quote Quote  
  26. Originally Posted by lollo View Post
    Never had that message. Inside menues AmarecTV -> "Recording" -> "Video File Setting" set "Frame rate" to 999 fps to let the Capture Card settings take control on it.
    That's how it was set - I tried playing with it and had the same result each time... although despite that, everything seemed to be working fine.

    Here's one short video which I captured today:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0jdewb6JCU

    Phillips VR1100, Hauppauge Card, AmarecTV + Lagarith.

    PS: Thanks a lot for taking time to reply!
    Quote Quote  
  27. Captures & Restoration lollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Italy
    Search Comp PM
    Post a sample of the raw capture, not a Youtube video.
    Quote Quote  
  28. Image
    [Attachment 85439 - Click to enlarge]

    Image
    [Attachment 85440 - Click to enlarge]


    Here's couple. Mind You, the tape I don't think was of the highest quality. It went for over 4 hours, so as I understand it was recorded in a long-play mode.
    Quote Quote  
  29. Captures & Restoration lollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Italy
    Search Comp PM
    A video, not images!

    I have seen that the rape is not one of the best, but we want to check the video architecture of the capture, its quality is what it is.
    Quote Quote  
  30. Allright, here it is - I got something in Italian for You :
    https://mega.nz/file/aABxUDTD#iSn_MK-M4Y79MeiwsY4uVhXOdAuy_mlaGhixqGcyXFQ
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!