lossless codec compressing in realtime released..

[Luna*]

New version of Alparysoft Lossless Codec is released.
http://www.alparysoft.com/prod/compression/index.php
Codec is developed for encoding and decoding of video without
any mathematical losses (i.e. source and destination video are absolutely identical after encoding/decoding process)
seems cool and better than HuffYUV!

[BJ_M]

if you didnt have to use thier software to make i work i seem to recall

[fmctm1sw]

seems cool and better than HuffYUV!

I appreciate keeping us up to date with this but I remember the same as BJ_M. Can I load this into virtualdub or Virtualvcr and capture just like huffyuv now?

[MrShavez]

I tiried it out and it seems to work A OK with Virtualdub. Qualitywise, don´t see any difference with hffyuv, files tend to be 1/5 smaller though... 8)

[bunyip]

Just did a test on it (using VirtualDub) and got some odd results:

Source : 7000 frames - 368x272 30fps

Codec   Setting         Speed           File Size
-----   -------         ----------      ---------
Huffy   n/a             64 fps          776 mb
Alpary  RealTime        32 fps          666 mb
 "       MaxCompress     11 fps          679 mb

Conclusion:
It seems too slow for serious full-size capture, file sizes are not much better, and why the larger file-size using the Max Compression option.
I'll stick with the tried-and-true Huffy.

[Luna*]

Just did a test on it (using VirtualDub) and got some odd results:

Source : 7000 frames - 368x272 30fps

...

tell me your system configuration u had made that tests on? and codec settings? coz i got some other (better then yours) results ..
the results were twice the size of it on pc with Athlon XP 1700+,256 RAM.

[bunyip]

tell me your system configuration u had made that tests on? and codec settings?

This test was done on an Athlon 1100 (256mb mem) Windows XP Pro which has been my video capture machine for several years (as you see Huffy is well within its limits).

The codec: RGB format enabled, prediction enabled.

I also have a Pentium4 3ghz with 1gb mem, that is used for video processing but I haven't tried the codec on this, obviously it should be faster.

the results were twice the size of it on pc with Athlon XP 1700+,256 RAM.

Are you saying that you got large file sizes using the Athlon?

[Luna*]

Are you saying that you got large file sizes using the Athlon?

Sorry for mistunderstanding..actually i meant the speed that was twice faster than during your test.