VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. Will it drop many frames, I have

    VIA Cyrix III
    Windows 98 SE
    318MB Ram
    600 mhz

    Will this do the job, I want to captuer at 352 x 288
    Quote Quote  
  2. My experience says that much depends on which program you use for capturing.

    I have an "older" system by today's standards - Pentium III/500 with 7200 HDD and 384 MB SDRAM and an AverTV PCI card. I capture 484x484.

    I used to use VirtualDub, but get audio sync problems and dropped frames.

    With the *exact* same compression codec, capture size (484x484), PicVideo MJPEG codec @19, etc in AVI_IO, I get either 0 or 1 dropped frame(s) in a 30 minute TV capture and no sync problems!

    Let's not even talk about how many frames the AverTV's own capture program drops or it's capture quality...
    Quote Quote  
  3. You'll probably be fine... I've captured 352x480 with one on a
    400Mhz machine and very minimal / insignificant frame drops.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Search Comp PM
    I've been happy with mine. The only time I tend to drop a worrying amount of frames is from an unstable video source. If you have a good clean signal feeding into the card you should be fine with your setup.

    Nick
    Quote Quote  
  5. WinTV is much much better than ATI TV wonder VE - Trust me I have experience with this. I like it so far - you will drop frames if you capture 680x480 - how depends on the proggy your using - but if your just interested in making VCD's than 320x240 should do you just fine. i capture that using whatever codec i want on a 900mhz and I dont drop any frames at all - so i wouldn't worry. If you want higher res than that with no dropped frames your gonna have to pay for it - and you aint gonna pay 50 bucks let me tell you
    Ok - you got me - i dont know anything - you happy now!
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!