One advantage of 1394 on some DVD Recorders is auto chapter creation based on timecode. Chapter points can be automatically created at every record pause point or every date change. This capability is lost using the analog input.Originally Posted by FulciLives
Does the Pioneer have Playlist assemble editing?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 31 to 49 of 49
-
Life is better when you focus on the signals instead of the noise.
-
Originally Posted by davideck
I mean mostly I am either doing a VHS/LD where I just need to trim the start and end points or a TV show where I just have to do the start/end and cut out the commercials. So I'm not doing what I consider to be "extensive" editing and I find it a breeze to do with the Pioneer.
But I haven't a clue what "Playlist assemble editing" is.
- John "FulciLives" Coleman"The eyes are the first thing that you have to destroy ... because they have seen too many bad things" - Lucio Fulci
EXPLORE THE FILMS OF LUCIO FULCI - THE MAESTRO OF GORE
-
A couple of more questions:
1. Am I correct in assuming that the DVD/HDD recorder does the A-D conversion or do I need to input the already converted digital video?
2. Do these recorders have TBC circuitry, and if so how do you know if it is full frame or not?
3. Is there any problem with passing the signal thru more than one TBC, i.e. outputting from my Panny 1980 TBC into a recorder with TBC?
4. Can these DVD/HDD units be used to record television? If so, what would the advantage of TIVO be over these units?
Thanks
Scott -
Originally Posted by FulciLives
Let's say you have a capture file that you divide into chapters. For example, a TV show capture file could be divided into chapters of program segments and chapters of commercial segments.
A Playlist specifies a list of chapters to be included (assembled) into a playback sequence or burned to a DVD. By including only the chapters of program segments, a DVD without commercials can be burned. Creating a Playlist does not create additional video on the HDD, nor does it delete any.
The neat part is that a Playlist can include chapters from multiple capture files. For example, if ten different home video captures each contain a birthday party chapter, then these birthday party chapters can be assembled into one Playlist and burned to DVD.
Since no original content is deleted by this process, multiple Playlists can be created which all reference different chapters within the same capture files. One Playlist could be all of the birthday parties. Another could be all of the bedtime stories, etc.
The Toshiba also lets you create a DVD made up of multiple Playlists. Each Playlist would be a separate title.Life is better when you focus on the signals instead of the noise. -
Originally Posted by gasman2
Originally Posted by gasman2
Originally Posted by gasman2
Originally Posted by gasman2Life is better when you focus on the signals instead of the noise. -
Originally Posted by gasman2
Originally Posted by gasman2
Originally Posted by gasman2
Originally Posted by gasman2
However a special note here about DVR boxes. For instance I have COMCAST cable and my cable box is also a DVR box. If I record to the DVR from a DIGITAL CABLE CHANNEL then the recording to the DVR is a "perfect" digital back-up of the original broadcast. In fact if the original broadcast is in HDTV so too will the recording! It is not uncommon for me to record the DIGITAL CABLE CHANNELS to the DVR first (especially if HDTV) and then play it back from the DVR to record to the DVD recorder if I decide I want to keep it (and after I have watched it once in true HDTV if of course it was a HDTV broadcast). Please note that the DVR will record from ANALOG CABLE CHANNELS in a lossy form so when I record programs from ANALOG CABLE CHANNELS I record those straight to the DVD recorder even if I only intend to watch once and delete (yet another reason for the need of a DVD recorder with a built-in HDD). However if I decide I want to keep the recording at least it is already in MPEG-2 DVD spec format. If I record an ANALOG CABLE CHANNEL to the DVR first then that is one layer of compression then if I decided to play it out to the DVD recorder to record to a DVD Video disc that is a 2nd layer of compression. So for that reason all ANALOG CABLE CHANNELS go straight to my DVD recorder so I only get one layer of compression.
In short I would never buy a DVD recorder without a built-in HDD if I expect to use it for TV recording. Why? If you have no built-in HDD then you are limited to the capacity of a DVD disc. With a built-in HDD you can record hours of content then record to DVD discs when needed. It also gives you the ability to record to the HDD and watch it and then delete it without having to burn to a DVD disc.
Let me give you an example. I remember one Saturday when the Sci-Fi channel played a 6 or 8 hour block (I forget now) of UFO type related documentaries. Since I had a DVD recorder with a built-in HDD I just recorded the whole thing as one big block but used the SP (2 hour mode). Later I was able to go into the HDD and cut that recording up into 2 hour blocks so I could burn the shows onto (multiple) DVD discs. Had I not had a model with a built-in HDD then I would have been stuck doing the following: Baby sit it and swap DVD discs every two hours OR record the whole thing onto one disc using the utterly horrible and unwatchable 6/8 hour mode!
- John "FulciLives" Coleman"The eyes are the first thing that you have to destroy ... because they have seen too many bad things" - Lucio Fulci
EXPLORE THE FILMS OF LUCIO FULCI - THE MAESTRO OF GORE
-
Davideck: You state that you do your editing on your Toshiba. Being a Newbie, does this editing involve manipulation of the signal to improve it, or is it just the authoring of the DVD that you do on the DVD recorder?
Returning to my initial purpose for this exercise, I will be working with old VHS recordings which would benefit from signal enhancement. I realize that I am asking questions having had no experience with this at present (which makes me feel kinda impotent!) and I am relying on you guys to point me in the most sensible direction. You are definitely doing that so bear with me. I have a habit of overthinking most of my projects (and that is also the fun part), and you have detailed a prudent approach in using a DVD/HDD recorder. I am still confused about what to do after I have captured the best digital copy of a tape on the HDD. What programs allow relatively straightforward enhancement of that copy and where does this process take place?
This is a great winter project and I assure you I will spend the time necessary to become proficient in it, but I just want to make sure I choose the path the is reasonably executed by me. I have to admit that I suffer from "the enemy of good is better" syndrome.
Thanks for your help.
Scott -
There is a company called SignVideo and they make high quality video equipment.
Those of us that really get into it (and have the money) have said (not I as I don't have that kind of money unfortunately) that the gear from SignVideo is "essential".
Specifically I refer to the SignVideo Single Proc Amp and the SignVideo Image Enhancer.
Now these devices are not cheap ... a combined total of $750 US Dollars for both ... but they allow correction of various video parameters not otherwise adjustable without them.
So assuming money is no object (knock on wood) a most excellent setup would include a quality S-VHS VCR (as you already have) along with a Full Frame TBC (such as the DataVideo TBC-1000) along with the two SignVideo products I just mentioned along with an excellent model stand alone DVD recorder.
Add to that the fact that you probably want to get the final product to a computer. That is easily done by burning to a DVD-RW or DVD+RW then RIPPING to a computer. There you can do any editing if need be (both VideoRedo and MPEG-VCR do frame accurate MPEG-2 DVD spec editing) along with a nice DVD authoring program (such as TMPGEnc DVD Author 2.0) so that you can create a custom menu and chapters and when you are finally all done you can burn it to a final DVD-R using ImgBurn and your computer's DVD burner. So figure about $50 give or taking for the MPEG editor and another $100 or so for a DVD authoring program.
All very expensive it you go full out.
The other possibility is that you do essentially the same thing hardware wise but that you use the Canopus ADVC-110 to capture to DV AVI on the computer ... this in lieu of the stand alone DVD recorder. The benefit here if you will is that you end up with DV AVI which is a format that is very easy to edit and is the preferred editing format if you need to do extensive editing. By extensive editing I would be referring to say home made camcorder footage that you need to cut and re-arrange and add titles and special effects etc. otherwise if you are only making copies of movies or TV shows you really aren't doing what I think of as "extensive" editing since all you need to do is trim the start and end points of the capture/recording and edit out the commercials and that is very easy basic editing. The other nice ability though of the computer method is that you can use a software MPEG-2 DVD spec encoder. This allows you to fine tune the encoding and allows you to do a true multi-pass VBR encode that can be better than the real-time encode that a stand alone DVD recorder can do since it doesn't have the benefit of doing a multi-pass approach and instead must to it once in real time.
Also with the computer method you can apply video and/or audio filters that will "clean up" the image/sound to an extent and even if you still use something like the SignVideo gear you will still find that certain things can only be fixed in software. For instance a friend of mine had a super rare cable TV recording of a TV mini-series never released onto any video format but this recording was done from a cable TV channel with very poor reception that gave it a very "static" like look but thankfully the "static" was very much "spread out" and I was able to use a software filter called "DeSpot" that removed it extremely well without destroying the overall image quality. That is just one example of a filter that no piece of hardware can mimic. However if you have the money and the eye for it the SignVideo hardware is good even in the computer capture situation as it allows you to fine tune the capture in the analog stage i.e., before it is laid down into a digital format.
I think it is important to remember that you don't need all of these hardware items to still achieve good results and even with all this hardware (especially the SignVideo stuff) you need a good eye (and an excellent monitoring TV) to really use it all properly.
There are some great posts in the RESTORATION forum ... one of which covers hardware processors ala the SignVideo gear. You might do yourself a favor and look for such posts in that section of the forums.
Also don't be afraid to take your time ... I think I read these forums on and off for a good year before I really started doing much of anything myself and started to post etc.
There is a lot to know and SO many pitfalls that it just can't all fit into a single thread or two or three etc.
- John "FulciLives" Coleman"The eyes are the first thing that you have to destroy ... because they have seen too many bad things" - Lucio Fulci
EXPLORE THE FILMS OF LUCIO FULCI - THE MAESTRO OF GORE
-
Originally Posted by gasman2
Your AG-1980 has a sharpness control. Some DVD Recorders have certain Proc Amp controls at their inputs. Most provide some amount of noise reduction.
IMO, it is best to keep the video signal path as direct as possible. Every element in a signal path is a potential source of noise and/or distortion and should therefore have a reason for being included. For example, if you are not experiencing copy-protection problems, then I see no reason for adding another TBC/Frame Synchronizer into your signal path. With the AG-1980 and a DVD/HDD Recorder, you will already have two of them.Life is better when you focus on the signals instead of the noise. -
Thanks to davideck and FulciLives' persistence, I am starting to get it! It appears that the hardware influences on the quality of the digital reproduction are critical and (for a newbie like me) the most easily understood and controlled. I am hoping that my software needs will be for "simple" editing and authoring. I will soon have a good hardware signal path from my AG 1980 to the DVD/HDD recorder. I am sure I will have questions after I begin to experiment with capture and editing and they will follow.
One more question today. There is much written about the quality of the MPEG encoder and it's influence on the quality and quantity of material that can be fit on a DVD. I am assuming that those DVD recorders mentioned have high quality encoders. Anything I should know or look for as I prepare to buy my DVD/HDD recorder?
Thanks
Scott -
Good all around information....This should be a STICKY!!!!
-
Originally Posted by gasman2
Copy protection problems could then be handled by something like a Hauppauge PVR-250 Capture Card, which would provide real time encoding directly to your PC hard drive for whenever you want or need to capture, edit, author, and burn on the PC.Life is better when you focus on the signals instead of the noise. -
Originally Posted by FulciLives
Analog and digital signal processing are almost interchangable nowaday. There are most likely digital process amplifier and enhancer out there. -
For what it's worth I made some video samples using my Pioneer DVR-531H-s and by all reports the quality is the same as the current model (the Pioneer DVR-640H-s).
Here are the links and info about each clip:
CLIP ONE LINK: http://rapidshare.com/files/3407601/sample1.mpg
68.2 MB file size.
This is a SP (2 hour mode) recording from a VHS video of the movie ALICE SWEET ALICE. The source was a SP speed VHS pre-record which was played back on one of the better Toshiba VHS VCR units using composite video. The quality of the VHS is only so-so (although an excellent "print" of the movie) which is why I picked it.
CLIP TWO LINK: http://rapidshare.com/files/3410247/sample2.mpg
92.1 MB file size.
This is a SP (2 hour mode) recording from a VHS video of the movie NATIONAL LAMPOON'S LOADED WEAPON 1. The source was a SP speed VHS pre-record which was played back on one of the better Toshiba VHS VCR units using composite video. The quality of the VHS is excellent for the format which is why I picked it.
CLIP THREE LINK: http://rapidshare.com/files/3426527/sample3.mpg
58.4 MB file size.
This is a SP (2 hour mode) recording from a HDTV broadcast of GHOSTBUSTERS 2 via my Comcast Motorola DCT 6412 III cable box. I used S-Video to connect the cable box to the DVD recorder and of course the cable box was set to 480i output as that is the only way to record HDTV to a DVD recorder.
CLIP FOUR LINK: http://rapidshare.com/files/3428876/sample4.mpg
67.9 MB file size.
This is a SP (2 hour mode) recording from a HDTV broadcast of a recent episode of the CBS TV show CSI via my Comcast Motorola DCT 6412 III cable box. I used S-Video to connect the cable box to the DVD recorder and of course the cable box was set to 480i output as that is the only way to record HDTV to a DVD recorder.
I picked 4 clips because I wanted 2 for VHS and 2 for a "clean" source ala the HDTV broadcasts. The ALICE SWEET ALICE clip is actually the best looking "print" of the movie I've seen (actually better than the so-called remaster that was released years after this release) but the quality of the VHS was only SO-SO which is why I picked it. I also wanted to pick what I thought was a "high quality" VHS release hence the LOADED WEAPON clip. The two HDTV clips came from the HD ON-DEMAND section of Comcast.
Note that the CSI clip includes the opening moments of that episode plus the entire opening credit sequence of the show which if you know the show is a very fast paced quickly edited piece of video and the bitrate really spikes on it to accommodate this type of video content.
Let me know what you think. Oh and for best effect author and burn these clips to a DVD-RW or DVD+RW and watch them via your DVD player on your TV. After all they are DVD Video compliant clips
- John "FulciLives" Coleman
P.S.
When you click on a link it takes you to the RAPID SHARE website. Scroll down to the bottom and click on "FREE" unless you have a Premium account (but that costs money) so click on "FREE" and that takes you to another page where you will have to wait (a time counter ticks down) to start your download. Once the timer is done ticking the download link becomes visible and there you go!"The eyes are the first thing that you have to destroy ... because they have seen too many bad things" - Lucio Fulci
EXPLORE THE FILMS OF LUCIO FULCI - THE MAESTRO OF GORE
-
OK, I am getting set up now. My signal path will be as follows: Panasonic AG1980P thru a Vidicraft VDM300s processing amp/image enhancer(it has s-video connectors!) to a Toshiba DVD/HDD recorder. What is the recommended video monitor to use to judge the quality of the finished product? I would assume that I need a quality monitor with good resolution. Also, I would assume I should place it at the end of the signal path connected to the output of the DVD recorder. Suggestions?
Thanks
Scott -
I suggest an HDTV. Your DVDs will eventually be viewed on one, so why not optimize?
Life is better when you focus on the signals instead of the noise. -
Well you want to use a high quality monitor such as this: CLICK HERE
Not a bad price for a production monitor.
Here is a list of other such models but as you can see the price can "get up there" with many models: CLICK HERE
- John "FulciLives" Coleman"The eyes are the first thing that you have to destroy ... because they have seen too many bad things" - Lucio Fulci
EXPLORE THE FILMS OF LUCIO FULCI - THE MAESTRO OF GORE
-
Good morning gentlemen. I have assembled my VHS playback/enhancement devices and have to say that in my earlier posts I was worried about stuff that wasn't important(overthinking the problem is a common occurrance for me!). Even my oldest tapes recorded on standard VHS look pretty impressive out of the Panny 1980. I am learning how to use the Vidicraft 300s and the Sima SCC, but even the un-tweaked image is quite acceptible.
Now I need to capture it. I am looking at the Toshiba RD-XS55 for this purpose. I am sold on Davideck's opinions on Toshiba and have to say that he has always steered me in the most prudent direction. I am not sure that I need all the features this DVD/HDD offers and know that a less expensive model would suffice for the project at hand, but the one potential advantage this model offers over the other Toshibas is the networking capabilities. My questions are as follows:
1. Will the hard drive in this unit act as an external hard drive to use for picture storage, backup of documents,etc.?
2. Will I be able to edit/author my DVDs from my computer(i.e. will the playlist feature be available from my computer?). I am using our HD monitor TV to tweak my process enhancement and color, but once I have captured the best rendition of each video it would be nice to work on them on my computer. Possible??
Again, I want to thank everyone who has helped and encouraged me. As they say, I couldn't have gotten this far without you!
Happy Thanksgiving weekend,
Scott -
Just to let you know ... if you capture with a DV capture card ...
One hour of capture will eat up about 13 Gigs of hard drive space.
You better have alot of hard drives or a couple of big ones somewhere.
Check out the Frys sale ... Maxtor hard drives ... 300 Gig for ... $60 bucks.
Similar Threads
-
I'm running out of time and I need some help... VHS to DVD
By Boxster in forum Video ConversionReplies: 20Last Post: 1st Apr 2011, 16:36 -
Severe drag on captured video VHS to PC.
By Sparrowhawk in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 3Last Post: 3rd Mar 2011, 14:17 -
Help the beginner time ... VHS > TBC > ADVC300 > PC
By Tafflad in forum RestorationReplies: 48Last Post: 21st Feb 2010, 16:06 -
Removing a running time from vhs conversion
By eiffelgirl in forum EditingReplies: 10Last Post: 4th Dec 2008, 00:41 -
MiniDV Timecode preservation
By schematic2 in forum Camcorders (DV/HDV/AVCHD/HD)Replies: 4Last Post: 10th Mar 2008, 11:22