VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Subject says it all. Theory or no, the 4200rpm drive on my brother's Toshiba p105-s9312 laptop was just not good enough to keep up with the DV data coming in on the firewire port. I don't know if I should have been surprised or not.

    Now I'm looking at trying to find a good laptop for my sister. There are a few with 7200rpm drives, but good deals are much, much easier to find on laptops with 5400rpm drives. So I'm trying to figure out whether or not such a speed would be reliably fast enough to handle realtime DV video.

    Any suggestions? ;p
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member gadgetguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    West Mitten, USA
    Search Comp PM
    5400 should work if you use a decent program like WinDV, however a laptop generally only has one hard drive so you are capsferring to the same drive as the OS and interruptions may occur.
    "Shut up Wesley!" -- Captain Jean-Luc Picard
    Buy My Books
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    5400RPM should work assuming the rest of the Toshibe is up to snuff. I'm not familiar with that unit but, as it has a firewire port, it should be sufficient assuming you have plenty of RAM (1GB+) to keep Windows from thrashing the drive (VM).
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Yep, familiar with those. WinDV has a great built-in cache that seems to be good for about three seconds of interruptions. On a desktop pc with a proper hdd, this is plenty sufficient, and I can even get away with doing some minor things during capture. The poor 4200rpm laptop didn't stand a chance. That's why I have this nagging reservation about a 5400rpm solution. In theory, 4200rpm "should" have been adequate (I mean, why else does the thing even have a firewire port?) but it wasn't.

    If anyone's actually captured DV on a 5400rpm drive, please relate your experience.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    The problem really isn't about hard drive "speed" so much as about the OS taking priority control over the hard drive. In other words, the OS is busy doing something else that it thinks has priority over your stream and takes control of the drive.

    This is a problem re: sharing one drive. A desktop two drive system is a better capture platform. A laptop needs all other disk access controlled to maintain the transfer.

    A DV transfer is just a stream of data. It keeps coming with little buffering. If the disk isn't ready, the data is discarded.

    Turn off background tasks and don't use the computer during the transfer. Back when I captured to a PIII 544 laptop, I maintained a separate hardware profile with just about everything other than IEEE-1394 port and hard drive controller disabled. You don't need to go to those extremes today.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Okay. Well, WinDV caches about three seconds (hard to say, really; it hits 100% but doesn't necessarily discard data at that point). Is there a program that caches even more? 500MB of ram ought to be good for a couple of minutes.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by Colmino
    Okay. Well, WinDV caches about three seconds (hard to say, really; it hits 100% but doesn't necessarily discard data at that point). Is there a program that caches even more? 500MB of ram ought to be good for a couple of minutes.
    It's something else in the OS services or antivirus or other task with higher interrupt priority. Try a separate profile with everything else absent. At an extreme you could even use a command line Linux but that would be going too far. My old PIII laptop with 256MB RAM did well with Win98Lite or XPLite. Your laptop is probably much faster than that.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Check to see how fragmented the laptop's hard drive is. If it is heavily fragmented, you can experience significant dropped frames since the captured file has to be written in small chunks all over the place.

    With laptops, best option is to use an external drive.
    John Miller
    Quote Quote  
  9. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by JohnnyMalaria
    Check to see how fragmented the laptop's hard drive is. If it is heavily fragmented, you can experience significant dropped frames since the captured file has to be written in small chunks all over the place.

    With laptops, best option is to use an external drive.
    This happens most when the drive is close to full. The drive head is seeking blank space.

    The other thing that seemed to help was partitioning the laptop drive to minimize head seek during capture.
    Quote Quote  
  10. Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Central FL
    Search Comp PM
    I had a Toshiba laptop with only a 40G 5400 drive and had no problems whatsoever capturing with it through firewire
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!