BIG TEST NERO 7 recode vs ORIGINAL

[bergslag]

Nero7 recode VS original pictures:

Also watch my post before :
https://forum.videohelp.com/viewtopic.php?t=298629

this is from the movie King Kong retail DVD - 9 which I then
compared to a trancoded picture at 70% with nero recode (using nero 7)

all pictures that ends with a 0 is original
all pictures that ends with a 1 is compressed with nero recode (nero 7) down to 70%

download the picture and use for example acdsee to scroll and compare the differents...

you can also see that the orignal pictures are a few kb bigger then the transcoded.

For my point its useless using CCE because it takes so much more time....this pictures are heavily zoomed and there is so few changes in quality from original compared to the transcodes so...you wont notice it watching the movie.

[bergslag]

60

60.jpg

[bergslag]

61

61.jpg

[bergslag]

70

70.jpg

[bergslag]

71

71.jpg

[bergslag]

80

80.jpg

[bergslag]

81

81.jpg

[bergslag]

30 this is the same as number 80.......just unzoomed

[bergslag]

31 this is the same as number 81.......just unzoomed

just want to show you.....if you dont look at the zoomed pictures you notice no change in quality..
remember there are 25 pictures / second on PAL......so you will not have time to zoom and study the change in quality..........use recode Nero (or dvd shrink, same motor) instead of CEE and so on.