VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Earth
    Search Comp PM
    does anybody know a good program for measuring the frequency response of mobile phone speaker? I need for a one time test only.
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member Soopafresh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    "Quality is cool, but don't forget... Content is King!"
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Earth
    Search Comp PM
    is 1.3v? Is it better run a Pink Noise through the speaker?
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Earth
    Search Comp PM
    Is there some better, more professional program for measuring the frequency response of mobile phone speaker? In particular, I need test the low frequency range.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Search Comp PM
    You do not measure frequency response with a program.
    You use an instrument or instruments of some sort,
    An obvious simple approach would be to feed ths speaker using a variable frequency signal generator (? computer generated ?) and to measure the output level of the sound from the loudspeaker. Two gadgets and a pencil and paper at least.
    As you dont say where you are I can not make further suggestions but a first-world high school is likley to have the necessary equipment.


    Perhaps the speaker carries a manufacturers identifier whick you can look up.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Originally Posted by siluet
    Is there some better, more professional program for measuring the frequency response of mobile phone speaker? In particular, I need test the low frequency range.
    3 Hz not low enough for you?
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    I'm assuming that you want to measure the frequency response with the speaker in its native environment (mounted in the mobile phone chassis). Mounted in the chassis, the frequency response will be different that just the bare speaker mounted in air.

    To do this, you need a specialized, sound proof chamber, a specialized and calibrated microphone and a signal generator. Most likely not readily available to the layman, but you could spend a couple thousand dollars and build one yourself.
    ICBM target coordinates:
    26° 14' 10.16"N -- 80° 16' 0.91"W
    Quote Quote  
  8. As others have indicated, you can just attach any old microphone to your computer, record the sound from your phone, and look at a frequency response graph. Microphones do not have flat frequency responses so you won't be able to tell if any problems are from the mic or from the speaker. You need a calibrated measurement system where the non-linearity of the microphone is compensated for.
    Quote Quote  
  9. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Earth
    Search Comp PM
    3Hz fully enough, sure.
    I just made some measurement with Audacity 1.2.6
    I used standard cheap multimedia Omni-directional condenser microphone with parameters specified:

    Frequency response: 20-16000 Hz
    Microphone sensitivity: -58 +/- 2dB
    S/N ratio: 60 dB or more

    I placed a mic near ~5-6cm from speaker, then played Pink Noise mp3 through the phone speaker, recorded it, then analyzed in Plot Spectrum. I'm not sure which values should be be set in dropdown selector opposite the Spectrum, and which mode better use: Log frequency or Linear. I just tried few. Below a few results:






    need help to interpret the results.. What's low frequency which can play phone? and which I can cut in High Pass Filter without affecting sound quality?
    Quote Quote  
  10. Plot the spectrum of the the pink noise source file and you'll see that pink noise should not present a flat spectrum. Amplitude decreases as frequency increases. You probably want to use a frequency sweep or white noise. And still, you won't know what defects are from the mic and what defects are from the speaker. Audacity's pink noise generator:



    Frequency Sweep in Audacity:
    http://www.storm-consultancy.com/blog/tutorials/sine-wave-frequency-sweep-with-audacity/
    Quote Quote  
  11. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Earth
    Search Comp PM
    there are many frequency test sweep signals available without generating them on audacity. But using sweep signal requires synchronous capture of signal?
    Quote Quote  
  12. Originally Posted by siluet
    there are many frequency test sweep signals available without generating them on audacity. But using sweep signal requires synchronous capture of signal?
    Why? You can just measure the time from peak to peak to determine the frequency at any point in the cap:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency#Definitions_and_units
    Quote Quote  
  13. You also need to take into account that the measured frequency response includes the fidelity of the mp3-encoded pink noise (mp3 encoding will almost certainly distort it), the phone's D/A converter, the phone's speaker, the microphone and the computer's audio interface.

    I used Room EQ Wizard recently to help treat a home studio and it has a bunch of useful tools including correcting for the computer's audio. And it is free.

    On the pink noise bit, you could use any of the suggested programs to look at the frequency spectrum. Just analyze the mp3 file directly and then via the phone. The difference between the spectra will give you a good hint at the response of the speaker (with the caveat of what I state above).
    Quote Quote  
  14. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Earth
    Search Comp PM
    more ideas? I just need professional program. The above programs doesn't suit me.
    Quote Quote  
  15. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Earth
    Search Comp PM
    here is just frequency response curve of my phone speaker, is it Ok to set High Pass Filter value 160Hz? Or more?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	frequencyr.jpg
Views:	10068
Size:	57.5 KB
ID:	34
    Quote Quote  
  16. Did you compensate for the frequency response of your microphone? If not the plot is pretty meaningless.

    Why would you need a high pass filter with a cutoff at 160 Hz? The sample contains virtually nothing down there.
    Quote Quote  
  17. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Earth
    Search Comp PM
    this graph is from manufacturer's specs of speaker, not mine. I just want supress lower frequences, as mobile speakers can't reproduce very low frequencies, and may even be damaged.
    Last edited by siluet; 29th Jan 2010 at 09:44.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!