VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. I have tried searches like google but the results all have to do with editing and do not give specifics
    Quote Quote  
  2. For sampling and playback at 44KHz, it will be 22KHz.
    Quote Quote  
  3. According to MS documentation:

    nSamplesPerSec

    Sample rate, in samples per second (hertz). If wFormatTag is WAVE_FORMAT_PCM, then common values for nSamplesPerSec are 8.0 kHz, 11.025 kHz, 22.05 kHz, and 44.1 kHz.


    nSamplesPerSec is a 'DWORD' which means it can range from 0 to 4,294,967,295.

    So, *in theory*, the existing PCM WAV format can accommodate any sampling frequency up to 4.3GHz!!!! (As long as it is a whole number of Hz).

    In practice, you can choose any value you like - the limitation will be whether any associated hardware supports it or not.

    Whatever the sampling frequency, the maximum reproducible frequency will be exactly half that.
    John Miller
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    United States
    Search PM
    so just out of curiosity, what is your application? Or is it just a curiosity?
    Quote Quote  
  5. Free Flying Soul liquid217's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by JohnnyMalaria
    Whatever the sampling frequency, the maximum reproducible frequency will be exactly half that.
    Hence, the Nyquist theorem
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist-Shannon_sampling_theorem

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist_frequency
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member Cornucopia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Deep in the Heart of Texas
    Search PM
    Trying to be practical, you'll need to stay within usual guidelines for sample rates, etc so that more mainstream applications can understand the files and be able to work with them.

    That gives you sample rates of:

    8, 11.025, 12, 16, 22.050, 24, 32, 44.100, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4, and 192kHz

    which when using the Nyquist theorem will give you upper frequency availabilities of:

    4, 5512.5, 6, 8, 11.025, 12, 16, 22.050, 24, 44.1, 48, 88.2, and 96kHz

    (these may all be a little less because of non-perfect filtering)

    The last 4 items won't be available in many programs, unless they're either very recent or were made to specifically accept higher samplerate material. Also, you may be able to convert/generate and save material in that high samplerate format, but unless you have a playback system that FULLY SUPPORTS high sample rates--ALL THROUGH THE CHAIN, you won't be able to enjoy it.
    Meaning, that whatever is the weakest link in your playback system (player software/hardware, drivers, soundcard/soundchips, cabling, receiver/D-to-A converter, amplifier, and speakers) will determine the highest frequencies heard. Oh, yeah--EARS, too!

    Scott
    Quote Quote  
  7. I am wanting to do research on animal's hearing
    Quote Quote  
  8. Do you have speakers that will output sounds over 20 KHz?
    Quote Quote  
  9. some peizos I have from a project long ago,I know they do ultrasonic,I don't have the specs on them
    Quote Quote  
  10. Peizos has strong odd harmonics, so the subject will react to 3x,5x,7x... of the test frequency. A Heil transformer is a better transducer.
    Quote Quote  
  11. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Brazil
    Search Comp PM
    @ JohnnyMalaria and Cornucopia
    wonderful lessons,cool posts! 8)

    @ jagabo
    Do you have speakers that will output sounds over 20 KHz?
    very cool question!
    when i asked in another forum about where they do they "scientifics tests" using "what speakers with what frequence range" and i was trying to explain that for audio scientific tests they in the end was using the ears....boom,was a "blasfemia"
    Quote Quote  
  12. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Brazil
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by SingSing
    Peizos has strong odd harmonics, so the subject will react to 3x,5x,7x... of the test frequency. A Heil transformer is a better transducer.
    hy SingSing
    re reading this whole cool treat i saw that your observations are very interesting and takes me to this question:
    how "they" read and measure the odd harmonics,distortions,etc in piezos?
    what "aparatos" and parameters are used?
    thanks!
    Quote Quote  
  13. I've seen piezo tweeters go to 55KHz and should work for animal testing,piezos also don't require a crossover.The only problem is the dB level will be too high and may cause hearing damage,make sure you use a dB meter and keep the volume under 90dB.
    http://www.lsu.edu/deafness/HearingRange.html
    Quote Quote  
  14. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Brazil
    Search Comp PM
    thanks for the link about "hearing range" MOVIEGEEK,very good.
    do you know another one showing how the frequences and levels are measure from piezos?...how can be measure and what tools are used? ! ?
    thanks so much
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!