I ask because I compressed some PNG files into a video and tried two quality settings. One at 10kbps and the other 20kbps both x265. The 10kbps video just seemed to be smoother and cleaner than the larger "better quality" version. Is that all happening in my head or what
		
			+ Reply to Thread
			
		
		
		
			
	
	
				Results 1 to 5 of 5
			
		- 
	
- 
	Which one resembles the original input more closely ? That's what "better quality" means in a lossy compression context 
 
 If you did it properly - same settings for everything else - the one with 2x actual bitrate should more closely resemble the original . "Smoother and cleaner" is probably less like the original, and more detail loss ; even if you prefer smoother and cleaner
 
 
 But if your PNG sequence had other subjective problems (e.g. noise) , perhaps pre-processing it would be an option or better approach .
- 
	
- 
	The original direct input, not the pre AI or 50 steps before... - meaning whatever your direct input is into the encoder. 2x more bitrate is going to resemble the AI output more closely 
 
 Possibly that's an AI temporal fluctuation problem that low bitrate is probably smoothing over. You should probably look into additional processing in the pipeline, instead of using lower bitrate to achieve desired results
Similar Threads
- 
  Volume compressionBy Aludin in forum AudioReplies: 6Last Post: 22nd Jul 2019, 12:16
- 
  Compression variancesBy Del Greenwell in forum Video ConversionReplies: 4Last Post: 3rd Nov 2018, 05:58
- 
  Magic video compressionBy Megafox in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 3Last Post: 6th Feb 2018, 15:58
- 
  Virtualdub compression errorBy ThomasCSR in forum User guidesReplies: 9Last Post: 5th Dec 2016, 10:49
- 
  Compression with VDBy Tafflad in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 18Last Post: 7th Feb 2016, 18:17


 
		
		 View Profile
				View Profile
			 View Forum Posts
				View Forum Posts
			 Private Message
				Private Message
			 
 
			
			
 Quote
 Quote
