VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 24 of 24
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Just got a Kindle Fire HD, I want to put some movies on it for when I travel, What does anyone suggest as the best way to do this, I assume I would have to convert the movie with some kind of video conversion software that supports the Kindle.
    Quote Quote  
  2. You need to decrypt the BD/DVD's first then use Handbrake to convert:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTr-m6qPlGA

    You might also get the app mentioned in this thread:

    http://www.amazon.com/forum/kindle?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=Fx1D7SY3BVSESG&cdThread=Tx3NPL04K8JDGJ
    Last edited by MOVIEGEEK; 4th Feb 2013 at 20:46.
    Quote Quote  
  3. aBigMeanie aedipuss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    666th portal
    Search Comp PM
    xmediarecode has a preset for the kindle fire hd
    --
    "a lot of people are better dead" - prisoner KSC2-303
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Thanks Guys, The video from youtube was very helpful, I'm going to try both xmediarecode & handbrake to see which is better or if their is any difference between the 2.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Peterborough, England
    Search Comp PM
    Don't forget the Kindle Fire is a triumph of marketing over substance. It is HD but only when plugged into something that can display HD, it's SD on it's own display.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member Cornucopia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Deep in the Heart of Texas
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by Richard_G View Post
    Don't forget the Kindle Fire is a triumph of marketing over substance. It is HD but only when plugged into something that can display HD, it's SD on it's own display.
    KindleFireHD's "1280 x 800" > 1280x720, which is surely considered HD by the vast majority of consumers & professionals (particularly at that screen size), so I don't know where you are getting this SD business...

    Scott
    Quote Quote  
  7. Originally Posted by Richard_G View Post
    Don't forget the Kindle Fire is a triumph of marketing over substance. It is HD but only when plugged into something that can display HD, it's SD on it's own display.
    You must be an Apple fanboy since Apple has been marketing style over substance for years.

    As Scott mentioned the HD models are 1280x800 or 1920x1200:

    https://developer.amazon.com/sdk/fire/specifications.html
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Peterborough, England
    Search Comp PM
    Definitely not an Apple fan, all I'm going on is the Kindle Fire HD that my father was given as a Christmas present does not display HD on the screen, only when plugged into an HD display. 1280x800 isn't HD in my book, 1920x1080 is.
    Quote Quote  
  9. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by Richard_G View Post
    Definitely not an Apple fan, all I'm going on is the Kindle Fire HD that my father was given as a Christmas present does not display HD on the screen, only when plugged into an HD display. 1280x800 isn't HD in my book, 1920x1080 is.
    Since when is 720p (1280x720) not considered high definition?
    Last edited by usually_quiet; 5th Feb 2013 at 12:33.
    Quote Quote  
  10. aBigMeanie aedipuss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    666th portal
    Search Comp PM
    maybe with 4k displays now available standards need changing. <(\
    --
    "a lot of people are better dead" - prisoner KSC2-303
    Quote Quote  
  11. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by aedipuss View Post
    maybe with 4k displays now available standards need changing. <(\
    I think we are getting ahead of ourselves by re-evaluating the criteria for calling something HD. There isn't a great deal of video available for home use yet that goes above 1920x1080 resolution. Anyway, those displays have already been officially dubbed "Ultra HD".
    Quote Quote  
  12. aBigMeanie aedipuss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    666th portal
    Search Comp PM
    it was a joke. sometimes levity is needed around here. the old "wizard with a wand" got kinda wacky with auto smiley detection.
    --
    "a lot of people are better dead" - prisoner KSC2-303
    Quote Quote  
  13. Member Cornucopia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Deep in the Heart of Texas
    Search PM
    Years ago, when digital HD was just starting to become available, this had been a point of contention, but it was ultimately and finally decided by Industry consensus:

    720x576 or lower, interlaced is considered SD (standard def).
    1280x720 or higher, is considered HD (high def), whether interlaced or progressive.
    Anything in-between, plus 720x576 or 720x480 progressive, would be considered ED (extended def).

    This is what all techies & marketers have been going by since ~2004.

    Now, 2k, 4k & 8k are being added to the mix. Since 2k is nearly the same as 1080p, that still falls under the realm of HD. 4k & 8k are already being included under the new, and fairly agreed-upon term of UHD (ultra-high def).

    Like I said a moment ago: on a screen the size of 7", a 720p image should look IDENTICAL to a 1080p image. Doesn't just have to do with the # of pixels, it has to do with the resolving power of our eyes (aka visual acuity, ~1 arc minute), so this includes the size of the pixels themselves (partly determined by the screen size) and the distance of the viewer from the screen.
    IOW, even if you had a 4k screen, it couldn't look any sharper to you on a 7" screen at normal viewing distances, compared to 720p resolution. It's not just personal, anecdotal labelling going on here, it's objective, scientific designations. *

    Don't really know where Apple ever entered into this...?

    Scott

    *(although at the beginning of Television, the electronic tube scanning format was considered HD compared to the opto-mechanical formats previously tried (which had an equivalent resolution of ~240x180 @ 30Hz)
    Quote Quote  
  14. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by aedipuss View Post
    it was a joke. sometimes levity is needed around here. the old "wizard with a wand" got kinda wacky with auto smiley detection.
    Thanks, I have the flu, so I needed the explanation. Couldn't figure out what the extra characters meant.
    Quote Quote  
  15. Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Thanks for all the information, I was hoping my kindle fire HD played HD movies at least that's what I thought the HD stood for and it does list as a 1280x800 high definition LCD display , guess I should look more into it before doing movies on it.
    Quote Quote  
  16. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by tarzan54 View Post
    Thanks for all the information, I was hoping my kindle fire HD played HD movies at least that's what I thought the HD stood for and it does list as a 1280x800 high definition LCD display , guess I should look more into it before doing movies on it.
    According to Amazon, the Kindle HD plays 720p video, which qualifies as HD, but the video has to be provided in a form it can use.
    Quote Quote  
  17. Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Peterborough, England
    Search Comp PM
    I was only going on what my father told me at Christmas. He was complaining that the Kindle Fire HD only did HD when plugged into an external HD display. It now transpires that he was expecting that something with the HD designation would run at full 1080p and nothing less. However, it is something that needs to be taken into account when converting movies to put on it. There's no point in filling it full of files at 1080p that it can't display, when 720p will take up far less storage space.
    Quote Quote  
  18. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Freedonia
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by Richard_G View Post
    There's no point in filling it full of files at 1080p that it can't display, when 720p will take up far less storage space.
    Technically, being 720p instead of 1080p does NOT automagically make a file smaller. As always, it's bitrate, bitrate, bitrate. Yes 720p should be able to use a lower bitrate than 1080p but it doesn't have to.
    Quote Quote  
  19. Member Cornucopia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Deep in the Heart of Texas
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by Richard_G View Post
    I was only going on what my father told me at Christmas. He was complaining that the Kindle Fire HD only did HD when plugged into an external HD display. It now transpires that he was expecting that something with the HD designation would run at full 1080p and nothing less. However, it is something that needs to be taken into account when converting movies to put on it. There's no point in filling it full of files at 1080p that it can't display, when 720p will take up far less storage space.
    I've got an even cheaper Android knock-off, and it can display 1080p on its 800x600 screen. It just resizes it down (plus, stutters like crazy because of the bitrate bottleneck). I'm pretty sure the K.F.HD. could do the same. If the bitrate were in the usable range of its processor, it should handle it fine.

    Doh, jman98 got to it first!

    Scott
    Quote Quote  
  20. Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    usuaully_quiet, Your correct about the Kindle fire HD displaying 1280x800 resolution an video playback at 720p, So guys, When I convert my movies to the kindle format do I use the 720p setting?
    Quote Quote  
  21. Originally Posted by tarzan54 View Post
    usuaully_quiet, Your correct about the Kindle fire HD displaying 1280x800 resolution an video playback at 720p, So guys, When I convert my movies to the kindle format do I use the 720p setting?
    If the source is Blu-ray then yes, if it's a DVD then just use 863x480(16:9) and let the Kindle upscale.
    Quote Quote  
  22. aBigMeanie aedipuss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    666th portal
    Search Comp PM
    the kindle has a dual cpu and dual gpu like my nook hd+, so it shouldn't have a problem with any 720p video. i'd use the xmediarecode kindle mp4 preset and only change the bitrate control to cq and start with maybe a cq of 20 for it. adjust down for higher quality and larger filesize, higher number cq for lower quality smaller filesize.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	2013-02-06_121817.png
Views:	489
Size:	35.6 KB
ID:	16160
    Click image for larger version

Name:	2013-02-06_121837.png
Views:	200
Size:	53.9 KB
ID:	16161
    --
    "a lot of people are better dead" - prisoner KSC2-303
    Quote Quote  
  23. aBigMeanie aedipuss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    666th portal
    Search Comp PM
    and the video size is on the filters screen

    Click image for larger version

Name:	2013-02-06_122337.png
Views:	450
Size:	27.4 KB
ID:	16162
    --
    "a lot of people are better dead" - prisoner KSC2-303
    Quote Quote  
  24. Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Thanks aedipuss, Great guide on how to use the program xmediarecode for kindle, I will give it a try.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!