VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. I have captured some VHS at 640x480 resolution(my capturing software calls this "full size"), uncompressed in a .mov container, and then encoded it to H.264/AAC with a .mp4 container with Quicktime, and then burned it to DVD. On a CRT TV, as well as on a smaller HDTV, it looks fine, but on a bigger 50+ inch HDTV, it looks somewhat stretched. Is this just the way VHS looks on big HDTVs? Would capturing at DVD resolution(or any other resolution) make any difference? Also, would it make any difference if I used tmpgenc to encode the uncompressed .mov file to .mpg?
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by jrru2 View Post
    I have captured some VHS at 640x480 resolution(my capturing software calls this "full size"), uncompressed in a .mov container, and then encoded it to H.264/AAC with a .mp4 container with Quicktime, and then burned it to DVD. On a CRT TV, as well as on a smaller HDTV, it looks fine, but on a bigger 50+ inch HDTV, it looks somewhat stretched. Is this just the way VHS looks on big HDTVs? Would capturing at DVD resolution(or any other resolution) make any difference? Also, would it make any difference if I used tmpgenc to encode the uncompressed .mov file to .mpg?
    If you encoded with 4:3 aspect properties, then the issue is with your TV settings. Look for a button on the remote that says "wide" or "P.Size" or check the manual.
    Recommends: Kiva.org - Loans that change lives.
    http://www.kiva.org/about
    Quote Quote  
  3. Originally Posted by edDV View Post
    Originally Posted by jrru2 View Post
    I have captured some VHS at 640x480 resolution(my capturing software calls this "full size"), uncompressed in a .mov container, and then encoded it to H.264/AAC with a .mp4 container with Quicktime, and then burned it to DVD. On a CRT TV, as well as on a smaller HDTV, it looks fine, but on a bigger 50+ inch HDTV, it looks somewhat stretched. Is this just the way VHS looks on big HDTVs? Would capturing at DVD resolution(or any other resolution) make any difference? Also, would it make any difference if I used tmpgenc to encode the uncompressed .mov file to .mpg?
    If you encoded with 4:3 aspect properties, then the issue is with your TV settings. Look for a button on the remote that says "wide" or "P.Size" or check the manual.
    I don't mean that the picture is stretched out of its aspect ratio, there's no problem with the aspect ratio, it's 4:3 no matter what. When I said "stretched", I meant that the picture looks like both the height and width have been stretched, but the aspect ratio isn't any different. The way I noticed this is that among the TV's options for picture size is an option called "Smart View", and when I select this, the picture is shrunk to half its size with black bars all around it(like letterbox), but while its smaller, it looks clearer than it does at its normal size.
    Quote Quote  
  4. aBigMeanie aedipuss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    666th portal
    Search Comp PM
    probably too low a bitrate, and the fact you are stretching it from 480 to 1080.
    --
    "a lot of people are better dead" - prisoner KSC2-303
    Quote Quote  
  5. VHS is just a low resolution medium. Enlarging the picture just makes it more noticeable.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Freedonia
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by jagabo View Post
    VHS is just a low resolution medium. Enlarging the picture just makes it more noticeable.
    Probably this is it, although other possibilities would be that the playback device attached to the 50" TV is doing the stretching you see (an old Philips DVD player was notorious for this so it wouldn't surprise me if other models do it too) or the TV itself has botched things and is doing this although it shouldn't.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Pretty much all players and TVs will enlarge a small video to fit the screen. They often have the option of keeping the aspect ratio or stretching to fill the entire screen.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Originally Posted by jman98 View Post
    Originally Posted by jagabo View Post
    VHS is just a low resolution medium. Enlarging the picture just makes it more noticeable.
    Probably this is it, although other possibilities would be that the playback device attached to the 50" TV is doing the stretching you see (an old Philips DVD player was notorious for this so it wouldn't surprise me if other models do it too) or the TV itself has botched things and is doing this although it shouldn't.

    It's playing in a Samsung Blu-ray player, which I don't think is doing anything wrong.

    Originally Posted by jagabo View Post
    Pretty much all players and TVs will enlarge a small video to fit the screen. They often have the option of keeping the aspect ratio or stretching to fill the entire screen.
    As I said, the aspect ratio is fine, it keeps unless I tell the TV or the Blu-ray player not to keep it. The problem is that the picture looks just a little less clear on the 50" HDTV than it does on the smaller HDTV, and it looks the clearest on a 20" CRT TV, which I guess makes sense since that's where VHS was intended to be viewed.

    Maybe it is just the fact that the VHS is low-resoltion medium.
    Quote Quote  
  9. aBigMeanie aedipuss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    666th portal
    Search Comp PM
    Maybe it is just the fact that the VHS is low-resoltion medium.
    you got it. vhs starts with low quality - 240 lines of resolution to begin with(if you're lucky).
    --
    "a lot of people are better dead" - prisoner KSC2-303
    Quote Quote  
  10. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    How to explain this ....

    This is 640x480. Your display card is expanding it.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	480p-example.jpg
Views:	5704
Size:	42.4 KB
ID:	9471

    This is 640x480 in a 1280x720 frame before upscale (stretch)
    Click image for larger version

Name:	sampl_1280x720.png
Views:	882
Size:	535.6 KB
ID:	9472
    This is 640x480 in a 1920x1080 frame before upscale (stretch)
    Click image for larger version

Name:	sampl_1920x1080.png
Views:	916
Size:	451.8 KB
ID:	9473
    Recommends: Kiva.org - Loans that change lives.
    http://www.kiva.org/about
    Quote Quote  
  11. Originally Posted by edDV View Post
    How to explain this ....
    What's with the rolleyes? That was a bit rude.

    Anyway, I figured that that is what was/is happening. I was just holding out hope that there was a way around it, but it certainly doesn't seem like there is.

    I was being a little picky about the quality of the picture anyway, it looks good enough.

    Thanks for all the advice, all.
    Quote Quote  
  12. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by jrru2 View Post
    Originally Posted by edDV View Post
    How to explain this ....
    What's with the rolleyes? That was a bit rude.

    Anyway, I figured that that is what was/is happening. I was just holding out hope that there was a way around it, but it certainly doesn't seem like there is.

    I was being a little picky about the quality of the picture anyway, it looks good enough.

    Thanks for all the advice, all.
    Not intended to be rude. Was thinking how to explain it.
    Recommends: Kiva.org - Loans that change lives.
    http://www.kiva.org/about
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!