I've read that video meant to be viewed on interlaced displays is/was filtered in the vertical dimension because it would cause "twittering" otherwise, which is the reason true progressive video (not low-pass filtered) is said to have 30% higher vertical resolution than equivalent interlaced video. For instance, a true 480p would have 30% higher vertical resolution than 480i.
However, at what point in the production chain was the low pass filter applied? Let's say a TV series was shot on film and then telecined to either beta sp or 1-inch tape for a cable broadcast. Were the tapes containing the content already low-pass filtered, or was it low-pass filtered when they sent out the signal?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
-
It was low-passed the moment it was telecined, in other words the moment the film was scanned and transferred to any analog or digital standard definition format such as Beta.
-
The times certainly have changed, in the old days engineers got away with "explaining" people that low pass filters enhance the video, nowadays people know better!
Last edited by newpball; 15th Jul 2015 at 20:25.
Similar Threads
-
Any way to see delay applied to audio tracks in an MKV ?
By cpaqf1 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 3Last Post: 22nd Apr 2014, 15:13 -
Vertical low pass filter for telecining
By 90sTV in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 5Last Post: 18th Apr 2013, 10:03 -
x264, point of 1st Pass encoding?
By Sephisto in forum Video ConversionReplies: 50Last Post: 18th Apr 2012, 01:13 -
Need suggestions from pros on how to process low-level audio
By Asterra in forum AudioReplies: 2Last Post: 1st Jul 2011, 19:57 -
Ghads! I just applied for an external job and they know I post here.
By edDV in forum Off topicReplies: 1Last Post: 4th Feb 2011, 23:54