VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Search Comp PM
    I have a 10 x 1 video wall configured as a 10240 x 768 single screen. The creative guys are having some problems selecting which codec to use for encoding the video to play at this resolution. They like typical MAC people are stuck in "MAC vs PC" land instead of "how do we make this work?" My question is, has anyone done this before and can anyone recommend an approporiate codec to support this resolution?
    Quote Quote  
  2. So you need a single 10240x768 video file? What kind of sources will you be putting together? What kind of player will you be using?
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Search Comp PM
    Yes, the video files will be short single 10240x768 clips. Content is being created in adobe after effects, not too sure what hte creative guys use for the source.

    the player is a Dual Core E8500 CPU with 4GB RAM. Video cards are:

    2 x Matrox M9140 and 1 x M9120 each set at 1024 x 768. Our application displays the video full screen across the 10 displays. This is working, the only issue is codecs.... I think.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member Soopafresh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Might be easier on PC using Ultramon so you can more easily configure and organize 10 displays on your machine.

    http://www.realtimesoft.com/ultramon/overview/

    Codec? Good question. 10240x768, huh.... Try h264 in an MP4 container, high bit rate, like 18000kbs or higher.


    See h264 specs for maximum bitrates supported by the codec. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264


    What's the playback software?

    Again, this is all theoretical, but it should work.
    Quote Quote  
  5. A C2D probably won't be able to decode a 10240x768 h.264 video fast enough for smooth playback. I was able to create a file of that frame size with VirtualDub and X264VFW. My C2Q (Q6600) was topped out playing it back. Xvid and Divx seem to have problems at that frame size. HuffYUV and Lagarith work but don't give much compression. I suspect PicVideo MJPEG will work but I don't have it installed right now. Ffdshow's MJPEG encoder/decoder worked. Ffdshow's MPEG2 encoder/decoder worked.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by jagabo
    A C2D probably won't be able to decode a 10240x768 h.264 video fast enough for smooth playback. I was able to create a file of that frame size with VirtualDub and X264VFW. My C2Q (Q6600) was topped out playing it back. Xvid and Divx seem to have problems at that frame size. HuffYUV and Lagarith work but don't give much compression. I suspect PicVideo MJPEG will work but I don't have it installed right now.
    The test clips in .mov work fine, and it only uses one core, so a quad core won't make any difference which is why we went for more Hz than cores. Only thing is we don't want to use QuickTime because of API issues. We need it to play in WMP which is what has brought up the codec question.

    I should also add that we would like to protect the CPU load by using a low load/CPU intensive codec and also slow down frame rates etc. There are a lot of variables in this which is what prompts my question of "What is the recommended codec for this size res" once we have the codec spec'd correctly we can go back and reconfigure hardware to suit.
    Quote Quote  
  7. I also tested ffdshow's WMV9 in AVI and it worked. The C2D should be enough to handle MPEG2, MJPEG and WMV9 (WMV3 fourcc). I was seeing around 25 percent CPU usage on my Q6600. I couldn't get HuffYUV and Lagarith to play smoothly. And, as mentioned earlier, h.264 topped out my cpu. Although, if you plan to use low frame rates it might be ok.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Originally Posted by Andy9001
    we don't want to use QuickTime because of API issues
    MP4 and Haali ok?
    Quote Quote  
  9. Video Restorer lordsmurf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    dFAQ.us/lordsmurf
    Search Comp PM
    10240 sounds like a typo -- too many 0's in there.
    Did you mean 1024x768 ?
    Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
    FAQs: Best Blank DiscsBest TBCsBest VCRs for captureRestore VHS
    Quote Quote  
  10. No, he has 10 1024x768 monitors side-by-side and wants one video to span them.
    Quote Quote  
  11. Video Restorer lordsmurf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    dFAQ.us/lordsmurf
    Search Comp PM
    Concurrent played separate files (timer the start from a sync'd clock) may work best here.
    Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
    FAQs: Best Blank DiscsBest TBCsBest VCRs for captureRestore VHS
    Quote Quote  
  12. Here's a short 10240x768 29.97 fps x264 encoded mp4 sample:
    http://www.megaupload.com/?d=VK6T12LG
    There's no way this will play back smoothly on a Core 2 Duo.
    Quote Quote  
  13. Member MysticE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by jagabo
    Here's a short 10240x768 29.97 fps x264 encoded mp4 sample:
    http://www.megaupload.com/?d=VK6T12LG
    There's no way this will play back smoothly on a Core 2 Duo.
    What the hell you watching?
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!