Hi,
I've searched for a cheap DVD recorder and I almost bought a Lite-On LVW-5005XS when I've seen in the specifications that altough it does the 3h mode, it does it at 352x480 (see below). This is not a DVD format...
Is there a (cheap AND reliable) recorder that does the 3 hours mode ar 720x480?
HQ Approx. 1 hour 720x480
SP Approx. 2 hours 720x480
LP Approx. 3 hours 352x480
EP Approx. 4 hours 352x480
SLP Approx. 6 hours 352x240
Thanks
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 16 of 16
-
-
look up what is dvd. it clearly shows that 352x480 is a dvd complaint format.
How Big A Boy Are Ya? -
720x480 needs more bitrate than what is allowed at 3-4 hours (on single layer media). It will be blocky, and overall look like crap with plenty of encoder noise. Panasonic is especially yucky.
352x480 is a better allocation. Actually, at 3 hours, it is an OPTIMAL allocation.Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
FAQs: Best Blank Discs • Best TBCs • Best VCRs for capture • Restore VHS -
Thanks for correction ghoster but this is not the point.
What I need is the best quality that I can get out of a recorder and not semantics...
When I think of DVD I mean full D1 not half. DVD is olso the VCD 352x288 resolution. Would you record something, anything, inthis crappy format?
jagabo, that's what I needed.
lordsmurf, good reason for why I shouldn't look for something like this,
Thanks to you all -
Dual layer recorders could put 4 hours quite nicely on one DL disc but you'd have to split it into two 2 hour recordings as current dual layer recorders don't automatically cross the DL boundary (at least the Panasonics don't and I have not heard others can).
Panasonic DMR-ES45VS, keep those discs a burnin' -
Originally Posted by st1lgar
If I wanted to put 6 hours on a DVD, YES I WOULD use VCD resolution. Are you saying that at that bitrate you'd still use Full D1? And guess what? That's what DVD recorders do - because as crappy as VCD is, full D1 at that rate would look even worse. -
Hmm... 3 hours at 720x480 will not look as good as 352x480 on the TV screen.
The 720x480 will show fuzziness on the TV screen while the half D1 resolution look great.
VCD is crappy because of the 352x240 (240 !!!) and the fixed bit rate 1150kbps (too low for comfort). A few years ago, I used to make VCD (standard) and XVCD (352x240 but with higher bit rate), XVCD look a lot better than VCD. Then I learned to make SVCD (352x480), the video quality improves much much more.
Now I am totally relieve with DVD format, so flexible, and I still prefer half D1 for 3 hours or longer video per disc.ktnwin - PATIENCE -
The Pioneer DVR-531H-s ... the DVR-533H-s ... and the DVR-633H-s ... all three models will do 3 hours at Full D1 resolution (720x480 for NTSC) ... in fact they do not switch from Full D1 to Half D1 (352x480 for NTSC) until approximately 220 minutes or 3 hours and 40 minutes.
However as other people are trying to tell you ... Full D1 looks like shit at a bitrate needed in order to fit 3 hours onto one single layer DVD recordable.
For 3 hours on one single layer DVD recordable you need to use Half D1 in order to get a clean looking video ... in other words a video without excessive MPEG compression artifacts.
Yes it is true that 720x480 will look sharper than the slightly softer looking 352x480 but you would be surprised that the difference (in terms of resolution) is not that extreme.
So the choice at 3 hours boils down to this ...
1.) Full D1 with a slightly sharper image than Half D1 but full of MPEG compression artifacts.
2.) Half D1 with a slightly softer image than Full D1 but with a clean look i.e., little to no MPEG compression artifacts.
I used the 3 hour mode on my Pioneer DVR-531H-s once and I hated it. Never used it again. I am actually PISSED OFF that Pioneer doesn't use Half D1 at the 3 hour mark.
To each his own.
- John "FulciLives" Coleman"The eyes are the first thing that you have to destroy ... because they have seen too many bad things" - Lucio Fulci
EXPLORE THE FILMS OF LUCIO FULCI - THE MAESTRO OF GORE
-
We will regret recording low bitrates to DVDR just like we now regret using EP mode back then for the VHS classics.
Recommends: Kiva.org - Loans that change lives.
http://www.kiva.org/about -
Better soft than full of compression artefacts, IMO. But like FulciLives say - To each his own.
/Mats -
Originally Posted by mats.hogberg
-
352 sampling is beyond my tolerance level for picture softness, particularly for OTA, SVHS, and BI source material. Most of my VHS and BII tapes look better at 720 sampling as well. Only a slight few of my EP VHS and BIII Beta recordings were soft enough to make 352 sampling look acceptable.
Nevertheless, I also think that 352 sampling is the better choice for 3 hour mode. -
Originally Posted by Robbins1940
/Mats
Similar Threads
-
DVD Decrypter: File Mode total size double that of ISO read mode
By dare2be in forum DVD RippingReplies: 7Last Post: 13th Feb 2011, 12:21 -
JVC HR 9600....edit mode vs auto mode for digitizing s vhs or vhs
By fuzzblaster in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 21Last Post: 21st Jan 2011, 08:28 -
Hours of Music without Hours of Video Data in DVD Architect
By Guff22 in forum Authoring (DVD)Replies: 3Last Post: 6th Aug 2008, 21:23 -
Advantages of ripping in File mode over ISO mode...
By hiimbored in forum DVD RippingReplies: 9Last Post: 5th Jun 2008, 15:27 -
Why DVD (720x480) bigger than AVI(720x480)
By psxiso in forum Video ConversionReplies: 6Last Post: 3rd Feb 2008, 05:50