I LIKE TO NOW .WICH OS IS THE BEST TO WORK .
I AM WORKING WITH 98 SECOND EDITION BUT IS LIMIT ON FAT 32.
I WILL LIKE TO NOW IN BETEWEN WINDOWS 2000 PRO OR WINDOWS XP PRO IS MORE STABLE TO WORK .IT IS WORKING ON NTFS .
I WILL KEEP ON FIRST HARD DRIVE THE (98 SECOND EDITION) AND I WILL WORKING IN THE SECOND HARD DRIVE 2000 PRO OR XP PRO.
ON DUAL SET-UP
TO CAPTURE VIDEO ,MUSIC.ANALOGIC TO MPEG,FIREWIRE AND USB,DV TO MPEG .
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
-
-
I've been using XP for video capture and its been great so far. If its for home use and you don't have network security problem XP is good enough. XP probably has better driver support for DVD burners.
The more important issue is that your hard drive is formatted NTFS. My computer has two OS formatted into two hard drive, XP and ME. XP allows me to choose which system to boot up in the beginning and retain my old hard drive. I keep ME around for the old hardware that doesn't have updates for the driver. Anyhow, when you boot up with XP, you see both drives, but when you boot up with ME, you only see the FAT32 drive. -
Yeah, either win2k or XP (for NTFS). Truth is that XP has better support so I would go with that. The 4GB limit is a pain.
Similar Threads
-
captured some video
By the_man_one in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 10Last Post: 19th Aug 2011, 04:42 -
captured video with hauppauge card... video looks blurry
By granturissimus in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 4Last Post: 2nd Feb 2011, 06:43 -
wich video streaming website to choose with no limit features?
By s76x in forum Video Streaming DownloadingReplies: 3Last Post: 2nd Jun 2009, 03:32 -
Video info tool (cmd-line-way) wich one?
By squadjot in forum Video ConversionReplies: 2Last Post: 19th Sep 2008, 14:01 -
no sound when i captured from dv in adobe prem cs. even hd didn't work
By cannibalcam in forum AudioReplies: 7Last Post: 5th Mar 2008, 07:07