What is the difference between type 1 and 2 DV and if given the choice, what should one choose?
Also, is DV a lossless compression and do different implementations have different quality levels, or is it pretty much standard now?
Thanks.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
-
http://www.microsoft.com/hwdev/tech/stream/vidcap/dvavi.asp
The short version is that both Types have audio interleaved with video. Type 2 adds an additional audio track which is not interleaved making it more backwards compatible.
In practical terms, programs like Adobe Premiere expect Type 2 files and will report incorrect frame sizes and require rendering if you try to use Type 1. Ulead uses Type 1. So you should capture in the format that your editing program needs.
DV is not lossless. It is lightly compressed so there is some "loss" from the original source (ie. a 720 x480 frame for NTSC). However, once converted to DV, you now have a digital file which you can pass back and forth from editors, to the camera, etc with no difference in the file. So it is lossless in that sense. When you edit, only the frames that are changed get re-compressed. -
.... there are not different versions with different quality levels. It is a file transfer from camera to computer. The computer does no compression work (already done by camera, or DV bridge) so frame dropping is a thing of the past.
Similar Threads
-
No loss conversion
By Davross23 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 4Last Post: 27th Sep 2010, 10:28 -
Sound Loss
By yooza in forum AudioReplies: 1Last Post: 20th Jul 2008, 11:35 -
I need to transfer DV to an HD with no loss
By jbigfoot in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 2Last Post: 12th Mar 2008, 21:18 -
Loss of sound
By maccool111 in forum Authoring (DVD)Replies: 3Last Post: 7th Jan 2008, 08:21 -
audio loss??
By qwertyman in forum Video ConversionReplies: 0Last Post: 17th Jul 2007, 13:36