Should I be concerned about the performance of my PC? I have a Pentium 4 w/HT 3.0GHz processor with 2GB RAM running XP Home. I was experimenting with AVS4YOU to convert video files. The entire time my CPU was pegged @ 100% and, obviously, wasn’t able to run other programs too efficiently. My machine was severely crippled. I ran the same software on my work PC which has only a 1.8 GHz processor with only 512MB RAM running XP PRO. The work PC CPU was also pegged @ 100% but I was able to play mp3’s through WMP11, check e-mail, write this post in Word, and browse the internet without being too crippled. It was slow, but it functioned...unlike my PC
My personal PC originally came with 1GB RAM and I recently upgraded to 2GB because I thought it would help run applications better. The 2GB of RAM are recognized. Any suggestions?
Thanks,
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
-
-
Hello mattman1968;
I have pretty much the same set-up (see my computer details) and have learned to accept the limitations. Whenever backing up a DVD, I run no other applications except occasionally Task Manager, then only briefly to observe the CPU/RAM usage. Virus and spyware scans do take longer with a P-4 than with something newer and faster but I'm not trying to win a race. That said, my next PC will represent a considerable leap forward; Intel E8400 or E8500 or perhaps a quad-core.
I have read many posts (as I'm sure you have) from people detailing the improvements experienced via a processor upgrade. Unfortunately, I have a Dell which pretty much eliminates any cost effective upgrade. One thing you might try is to upgrade your graphics card, but I'm not sure that would give the performance boost I think you're looking for.
One positive note about the current economic situation; technology is cheaper than ever. If you feel the need to upgrade, now would be a great time ! -
Just set the process priority to below normal. It will take longer to convert your files, but you'll be able to use the computer for other things.
I don't know the cause, but some comps just die when encoding, others can multitask with no problem. There doesn't seem to be any link to CPU type or RAM.
I use Mainconcept for most of my encoding, simply because of speed, and it drags my Athlon 64 4000+ to a dead crawl. Reducing mainconcept's priority to below normal adds about 1/3 more time to the encode, but I can at least use the computer for other things at the same time.Cheers, Jim
My DVDLab Guides -
Thats the magic or core2duo .. far more efficient at processing and of course two actual cpu cores rather than one "pretending" to be two (HT), plus they run cooler than the surface of Jovious.
All tech will be cheaper after crimboCorned beef is now made to a higher standard than at any time in history.
The electronic components of the power part adopted a lot of Rubycons. -
Originally Posted by reboot
How much longer the conversion takes to complete will depend on how much you use the computer. If you don't do anything else on the computer the conversion won't take any longer. If you are simply web browsing and checking your email the conversion will only take a few percent longer. If you play 3D games the conversion will probably take a very long time.
Similar Threads
-
Which is better for speed and performance?
By SIRCOOKS in forum ComputerReplies: 3Last Post: 20th May 2010, 22:03 -
Should I be concerned after "critical issue" on boot up for XP?
By yoda313 in forum ComputerReplies: 22Last Post: 3rd Jul 2009, 12:11 -
Are you concerned about computer viruses?
By yoda313 in forum PollsReplies: 36Last Post: 10th Apr 2009, 20:54 -
CRYSIS performance
By retroborg in forum Off topicReplies: 4Last Post: 13th Dec 2007, 06:55 -
Still Performance
By crocker5731 in forum Camcorders (DV/HDV/AVCHD/HD)Replies: 5Last Post: 5th Dec 2007, 10:31