Hello, I have the following Rig:
Intel Core2 Duo 6600 @2.4GHZ
ASUS GeForce 7950GT 512MB
ASUS P5B-E (Intel P965chip set)
2GB DDR-2 800MHZ HyperX Kingston
Sound Blaster live 5.1!
Windows XP Pro SP2
What frames per sec should I expect from Crysis (Full Game, not demo) at High details, DX9 & 1280 x 1024?
Thanks in advance.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
-
-
You can use this and see if it will run it..
http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/referrer/srtest -
So, I just fired up Crysis.
The game detects optimum settings for my rig and sets everything to high @ 1024x768 Res and no 0xAA.
But the in-game frame rate is quite laggy, so I lowered the shadows to Low and Post processing to Medium @ 800x600, no 0xAA.
After these changes take place, for the most part the in-game frame rate seems to be fine with only a few slow downs in some intense fight scenes.
Strangely enough some of the cut-scenes still seem to be laggy.
I hadn't had time to run the in-game benchmark to get some precise FPS, I'll try it later and post my findings tomorrow
I did notice a bug where the sand next to the sea water in corrupted and full of large square pixels. A patch or newer nvidia driver should fix that!
Overall in DX9 & WinXP, the graphics, gameplay and theme, are just too similar to Far Cry which I was not too fond of.
It doesn't seem to be that much of an improvement and can't really say I'm impressed so far.
Similar Threads
-
Which is better for speed and performance?
By SIRCOOKS in forum ComputerReplies: 3Last Post: 20th May 2010, 22:03 -
check out these crysis 2 screenshots
By deadrats in forum Off topicReplies: 0Last Post: 6th Mar 2010, 22:23 -
Crysis Very Boring & Dull game?!
By retroborg in forum Off topicReplies: 0Last Post: 19th Apr 2009, 12:32 -
FFMpeg performance
By aeroliteflyer in forum DVD RippingReplies: 12Last Post: 18th Mar 2008, 19:47 -
Still Performance
By crocker5731 in forum Camcorders (DV/HDV/AVCHD/HD)Replies: 5Last Post: 5th Dec 2007, 10:31