I've been using Handbrake to convert Video_TS files to h.264 files and it's brutally slow on a G5. Over at the Handbrake forums, lots of people complain about Handbrake's lack of Altivec optimization for h.264. In comparison, the Intel libraries for h.264 are much more optimized and encoding to h.264 with Handbrake on an Intel Mac is much, much, much faster.
Has anyone compared ffmpegX's h.264 encoding speed to Handbrake's? Which one is faster and by how much?
Results 1 to 1 of 1
Similar Threads
-
BD Rebuilder, Ripbot 264 & Handbrake...any major differences between em?
By Moontrash in forum Blu-ray RippingReplies: 11Last Post: 23rd Jan 2012, 10:28 -
Best h.264 setting for optimal size/quality with handbrake.
By frickfrock99 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 4Last Post: 1st Oct 2010, 02:09 -
Handbrake H.264 question
By stiltman in forum DVD RippingReplies: 21Last Post: 21st Sep 2009, 13:34 -
HandBrake + WMV/H.264 input = no joy?
By x2x3x2 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 4Last Post: 10th Jul 2009, 00:29 -
ffmpegX and PSP h.264
By str in forum ffmpegX general discussionReplies: 4Last Post: 25th Feb 2008, 08:08