Hi everyone,
Got a Japanese NTSC TV-movie from a friend and noticed that the aspect ratio was distorted: the video is sorta squished.
I re-processed the MPEG2 video to 16:9 using TMPGEnc Plus and the aspect ratio looks fine, but now the motion in the video isn't very smooth at all... It has a "streaky" look to it as if the characters are moving really fast. Audio is just fine, though.
Any thoughts on why the aspect ration conversion affected this? And how do I correct this?
Your help would be greatly appreciated.![]()
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
-
Frank Zappa: "People wouldn't know a good movie if it smacked 'em in the face."
-
Does this only happen when watching on the PC ? (i.e. have you tried burning to an RW to test it out ?)
Was the source interlaced ?
When you saved it out, could you have saved it out as interlaced ?
Streaks can often appear on the PC when displaying interlaced source. This is normal, and usually wont appear on you TV.
The only other thing I can think of is that something strange happened when interpolating new pixels when you resized the video.Read my blog here.
-
Originally Posted by guns1inger
The motion problem occurs when watching it on my PC and on my TV (Yes, I did burn a DVDRW to test... forogt to mention that... Sorry)...
Interestingly, I was just fiddling with the settings and when I changed the output to non-interlaced (input source is interlaced), it seems to have fixed the problem... I'm sorta at a loss on why this apparently corrected the problem, but I can't argue with results.
If anyone has a technical explanation, I'd like to hear it from an educational standpoint...Frank Zappa: "People wouldn't know a good movie if it smacked 'em in the face." -
You should not see the interlacing on the TV, unless, perhaps, you have the field order reversed. All TV programs broadcast over the analogue network are interlaced, yet you don't see it.
Depending on the method used to deinterlace the footage, you might have thrown away half your resolution by discarding one of the fields, or blended the two fields together using one of a couple of methdos. Eitherway you have ended up with a progressive movie.Read my blog here.
-
Originally Posted by guns1inger
Depending on the method used to deinterlace the footage, you might have thrown away half your resolution by discarding one of the fields, or blended the two fields together using one of a couple of methdos. Eitherway you have ended up with a progressive movie.
Is there any way of knowing that I've thrown away half of my resolution quantitatively? I don't readily see any degradation in the picture quality after I burned a new DVDRW for viewing.
Thanks again for all you help.Frank Zappa: "People wouldn't know a good movie if it smacked 'em in the face."
Similar Threads
-
Aspect Ratio Help! 1.3 vs 1.0 and conversion from .m2t
By Bman. in forum EditingReplies: 9Last Post: 1st Oct 2009, 10:37 -
Video aspect ratio conversion
By cd090580 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 15Last Post: 22nd Sep 2008, 06:08 -
PC to MiniDV conversion: need aspect ratio change? Please, help.
By stason99 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 31Last Post: 8th May 2008, 19:02 -
DV 4:3 to 16:9 aspect ratio conversion
By hysteriah in forum Video ConversionReplies: 6Last Post: 9th Dec 2007, 02:40 -
Aspect ratio Conversion?
By Colmin in forum Media Center PC / MediaCentersReplies: 4Last Post: 25th Sep 2007, 17:18