VideoHelp Forum




Poll: Most Important Feature in DL Burner

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. Member waheed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Search Comp PM
    What is the most important feature you would look for in DL DVD Writers?

    In future, we will see DVD-R dual layer discs, (hopefully).

    Personally, I would vote for dual format support for DL.
    Quote Quote  
  2. I vote for the same as above
    If it's wet, drink it

    My DVD Collection
    Quote Quote  
  3. Dual Format for me
    Quote Quote  
  4. CAV? Why would you want to burn with anything else than CLV for speeds <6x?

    I doubt any other book type than DVD-ROM will be good for DL discs so "bitsetting" is without doubt the most important feature for DL burning. I rather have one format with good compatibility than two formats with bad compatibility...
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member Edmund Blackadder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    USA / Ukraine
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by -jsl-
    I doubt any other book type than DVD-ROM will be good for DL discs so "bitsetting" is without doubt the most important feature for DL burning. I rather have one format with good compatibility than two formats with bad compatibility...
    Exactly. And I think the only DL format that does and will support DVD-ROM bitsetting is DVD+R9. So if DVD Forum's DVD-R9 does not have DVD-ROM recorded by default, there will be a big disappointment among its users. And of course some avid DVD-R supporters will try to do any kind of workaround with DVD-R9 just to stay away from DVD+R9 which is already about 97% compatible with current DVD players if you set book type to DVD-ROM (without DVD-ROM bitsetting it's only about 47% compatible).

    I was using and supporting DVD-R format way before DVD+R was introduced (still have my working DVR-A03), and was very angry when they did come out with DVD+R/RW as a competing format. But let's agree that at least on DL front DVD+RW camp has a cutting edge, and it will be stupid for DVD Forum to introduce a new format to the market for no other reason, but just to compete with the DVD+RW camp. DVD+R9 already works, is practical and widely compatible with DVD-ROM bitsetting, so why not just adopt it.

    P.S.: In fact one of my DVD+R9 DL discs with DVD-ROM bitsetting was successfully recognized and played by a couple of players in BestBuy that failed to play regular DVD+R5 with DVD-ROM bitsetting!!! There you go DVD Forum, try to compete with that kind of DL compatibility!
    Quote Quote  
  6. When did Pioneer say it will be coming out with a working DVD-R DL drive? Was it December 2004? Haven't heard anything from Pioneer in a while.
    Quote Quote  
  7. 4x DL burning already sounds ok, and i doubt i would care much about -R DL untill it been around for a while, so the first thing i will look for is that the name start with a P and ends with ioneer. From the available options i say "Dual format" is more important.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!