VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. Guest
    I am using VideoStudio 7 to capture and then convert from Huffyuv to MPG2 (VBR-8000 720*480)
    I have no problem and quality is good.

    It takes about 2 hours to encode a 50 minutes file. I have a AthlonXP 2000+, 1Gig memory, and use 2 HD 7200RPM.

    Is this normal speed?

    Thanks
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member housepig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    the Plains of Leng
    Search Comp PM
    that sounds okay.. some encoders are faster than others.

    TMPG takes about 4-5x the material length (ie 4 hours for a 1 hour movie), with excellent quality.

    MainConcept 1.3 only took 1.8x, but I didn't like the quality of the output file. so until I find a better encoder, I'll take quality over speed.

    but 2x sounds decent, if you like the quality you're getting.
    - housepig
    ----------------
    Housepig Records
    out now:
    Various Artists "Six Doors"
    Unicorn "Playing With Light"
    Quote Quote  
  3. CCE is real-time...

    CBR is 1X and N-pass VBR is (N+1)X with same excellent quality as TMPGEnc. (In CCE N-passes is actually [N+1] passes because the first pass creates the VAF file, and then it does N encoding passes).

    TMPGEnc is more flexible, CCE is faster, both are excellent. TMPGEnc is the winner for value/$$$.

    I also tried MainConcept but was not impressed with the results. Too grainy for my taste.

    vcddude
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member housepig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    the Plains of Leng
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by vcddude
    CCE is real-time...
    even on my PII/350?



    that's one hell of a program....
    - housepig
    ----------------
    Housepig Records
    out now:
    Various Artists "Six Doors"
    Unicorn "Playing With Light"
    Quote Quote  
  5. Guest
    Do we know what encoder Video Studio 7 is using?

    Thanks!
    Quote Quote  
  6. Oops, good point housepig!

    I should have been more specific. CCE is real-time on MY system which has:

    - 2.4 GHz Intel P4
    - 512 MB RAM
    - 200 GB HDD

    So, no I doubt it would be real-time on a P2/350.

    Also, MainConcept on my system was essentially real-time but as I said, the quality was not great.

    vcddude
    Quote Quote  
  7. Get Slack disturbed1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    init 4
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by frogywill
    Do we know what encoder Video Studio 7 is using?

    Thanks!
    It uses the mainconcept encoding engine.

    Huffyuv is very slow to decode, which is the major slow down. MJPEG decompresses faster, but can have less quality than Huffyuv.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by disturbed1
    Huffyuv is very slow to decode, which is the major slow down. MJPEG decompresses faster, but can have less quality than Huffyuv.
    I'd still suggest using huffyuv. It captures fairly easy with minimal dropped frames. On my 2.4GHz P4, I can get 720x480 and suffer maybe 1 dropped frame per 15 minutes. The only drawback is Huffyuv is a real space hog, easily eating about a Gig per minute.

    Mjpeg isn't quite as good quality wise and could be considered if the hard drive space is tight or if you're having trouble with Huffyuv.

    IIRC when I used TMPGEnc to convert to mpg2 (for DVD) it usually take me about 2-3 minutes for every 1 minute of captured video.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!