instant copy vs dvd2one

[wiprecords]

I have a question, which one gives you the best results by making a full disk copy? (dvd9 to dvd5, with all extra's and subs etc.)

[neomaine]

wiprecords,

I'm not going to answer until you can make the hoola-hoop move around the girl in your avatar....

Just kidding, but it would be kinda cool. There is already a ton of stuff on this very topic. Some heated, some informational.

Having tried both, I use InstantCopy over dvd2one because I find that IC gives me better quality. Here are some pros and cons:

IC:
pros=very good quality, built-in burn, full extras
cons=slower, need registry hack to get full quality/lose extras

dvd2one:
pros=good quality, much faster (now has full extras, but I haven't tried)
cons=not as good as IC quality

Since, time difference is not an issue for me (1-2hrs vs 20-30mins), I leaned toward the quality and have just gotten used to it. For a AMD 1800+ I find this quite exceptable.

Good luck on the topic . Also, you could also throw in DVD95Copy and others but I haven't tried any others yet. Things seem to work pretty good between these two.