Hi,
I'm using a Studio PCTV card to capture some camcorder images, and achieve pretty good results with a 384x288 frame size (UYVY format uncompressed). However the PAL standard VCD size is 352x288. Do I really need to crop my source image, or doesn't this matter much?
Alternatively, I was playing around with encoding my 384x288 image as an MPEG-2 SVCD but with the 384x288 resolution. On a setting of constant quality = 100, I get a slightly better image than in MPEG-1 format. But 384x288 is a lot less than the SVCD size of 576x432.
Windows Media Player seems not to worry about the different image formats I throw at it, so should I?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
-
Givem what you have, it maybe better to capture at 352x288 before making VCD. This avoid the resize operation during converting (faster).
To make SVCD (MPEG-2) which double the size of the MPEG file, you need to capture at least at 480x576 (PAL) to get good result. Anything less than that will be converted to 480x576 which will show some pixelation due to the enlargement.
Similar Threads
-
Does size really matter?
By ingeborgdot in forum ComputerReplies: 21Last Post: 25th Jun 2011, 10:11 -
Wrong image size ratio after AVI to DVD encoding
By video34bgi in forum Video ConversionReplies: 2Last Post: 22nd Jun 2009, 10:45 -
Image PPI -> DVD slideshow...does it matter?
By Grunberg in forum Authoring (DVD)Replies: 1Last Post: 12th Nov 2007, 17:06 -
Knowledgeable on the matter of CPU performance and encoding?
By Alendri in forum ComputerReplies: 8Last Post: 21st Sep 2007, 19:13 -
Image Size
By koberulz in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 6Last Post: 20th Jun 2007, 03:49