VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. Hey there!

    Short question: If I plan to rip an anamorphic DVD to SVCD, should I resize the ripped AVI before the MP2 encoding?

    Or put another way: as the 448 pixel wide frames are streched anyway (factor 1.5) for a normal 4:3 ratio and stretched even further to widescreen, 16:9, would it make sense to letterbox it first?

    I'm not quite sure what I'm aiming at really, but I have the feeling that anamorph material sucks up a lot of bandwith as there are no black letterbox borders at the top and bottom. Is there a quality gain worth it?

    What do you think?
    Thanks very much

    lichtgestalt
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Search Comp PM
    First off SVCD standard and most DVD players support DAR 4:3 only.
    If you have a widescreen TV, you can encode to 480x576 DAR 16:9, but probably it will be displayed stretched on your neighbor's 4:3 TV.

    Of course you have to resize and letterbox before encoding, no matter whether you use a Vdub, Avisynth or TMPG resize filter.

    Resizing to 480x576 anamorphic is not a quality gain unless you increase the bitrate drasticly.
    An example: Your source is DVD 720x576, DAR 16:9, anamorphic, not letterboxed.
    1. You can resize to 448x538 and add the borders left 16, top 19, right 16, buttom 19. -->XSVCD DAR 16:9. In this case you have to encode 952 macroblocks resp. 5712 blocks (YUV 4:2:0)
    2. You can resize to 448x404 and add the borders left 16, top 86, right 16, buttom 86. -->SVCD DAR 4:3. In this case you have to encode 728 macroblocks resp. 4368 blocks (YUV 4:2:0)
    As you can see in the 1st example you have to encode 30 % more pixels / blocks. So you have to use a 30 % higher bitrate. If this is no problem for you, do it, because you might end with a higher quality due to the higher resolution. If you want to fit more on one CD, resize to 4:3 and use the zoom function of the widescreen TV.
    Personally I don't believe, that the 16:9 example will look much better than the 4:3 example, but I can not proof it.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Thanks Mr. Truman!
    This is exactly what I wanted to hear and what I suspected from the start. The thing I wasn't sure about was the exact dimensions, 448x538 for 16:9 and 448x404 for 4:3. I'm still not sure how one arrives at those, but I gladly take that for further experimentation.

    Thanks again!

    lichtgestalt
    Quote Quote  
  4. Oh, we're talking PAL, right?

    lichtgestalt
    Quote Quote  
  5. Hello.
    Truman, can you explain to me wyh you want to add borders to the right and left side?? And as far as i know an "anamorphic" (DAR16:9) will look better than a zoomed 4:3 letterbox movie, but that's only my opinion.

    Maybe a bit of topic but anyway, if you play an anamorphic dvd on a 4:3 tv the picture get less horizontal resolution, as the player remove every 3:rd or 4:th line of the picture and then add the black "letterboxed" borders. This according to www.thedigitalbits.com

    So if you have an widescreen tv, anamorphic would be the best way to go.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Search Comp PM
    lichtgestalt, yes I'm talking about PAL and I use FitCD to do that calculations.
    Mr Walker, I add black borders arround the image, not only left and right, because these parts of the image are not visible anyway (TV overscan). Why should I waste bits? Yes, in theory a 16:9 anamorphic XSVCD must look better. Good, that you can confirm that. But only if you increase the bitrate.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Truman, why waste bits encoding the black borders?? Isn't it better to use those bits for something more useful, like the image itself?
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Search Comp PM
    you are kidding...
    Quote Quote  
  9. No, man, I don't know how MPEG2 encoding works, but I guess it will spend some bits encoding those black borders... just as MP3 spends some bits encoding silence passages... am I wrong?
    Quote Quote  
  10. Ok Overscan, thanx Truman. But how can you be sure what numbers. Every Tv is a little different, and it a shame if a movie looks good on one set but a "black line at the right" on a another just cause that tv isn't trimmed as the first one.

    Hope you get the point.
    Quote Quote  
  11. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Search Comp PM
    Yes, every TV is different. You have to check out the overscan area of your TV by yourself. You may download a sample SVCD image to test it. (Delete the .doc extension and extract)
    My TV displays only 432 of 480 pixels (horizontal resolution), 448 is a good rule of thumb.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!