AVCHDcoder JRE Not Found

[edgar_]

Hi guys


how to solve this error?




Thx

[davexnet]

Do you have the Java runtime installed? It is required by this app.

[edgar_]

Yeah, the installed version is higher

[Marsia Mariner]

Perhaps the application requires 32-bit Java and you installed the 64-bit edition?

[Cornucopia]

Java can have multiple versions installed. If that app likes/needs a certain version, re-install it. Just don't let it remove other versions - it should ask you.

Note: to maintain full functionality for all cohabitating versions, they probably should reside in different directories.

Scott

[LigH.de]

Some JAR application packages also provide an EXE launcher, but they often look only for versions following a specific numbering schema (like "jre1*"). Java 9 default installations do not match such patterns.

In addition:

Java 9 suddenly requires an explicit parameter listing modules to be loaded, which breaks compatibility in both ways, because Java up to v1.8.* does not ignore this yet unknown parameter.

Usually sufficient example for Java 9 starting a JAR application package:

C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\javapath\javaw.exe --add-modules ALL-SYSTEM -jar application.jar

If you know which, you can also list only the most vital modules.

[Marsia Mariner]

Thanks for the up-to-date info, LigH. I conclude Java 1.8 is the new Java 1.6.

Some JAR application packages also provide an EXE launcher, but they often look only for versions following a specific numbering schema (like "jre1*"). Java 9 default installations do not match such patterns.

In addition:

Java 9 suddenly requires an explicit parameter listing modules to be loaded, which breaks compatibility in both ways, because Java up to v1.8.* does not ignore this yet unknown parameter.

Usually sufficient example for Java 9 starting a JAR application package:

C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\javapath\javaw.exe --add-modules ALL-SYSTEM -jar application.jar

If you know which, you can also list only the most vital modules.