VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Norway
    Search Comp PM
    Hello!

    I know this question has been asked before, but I have looked around, and haven't really found a good answer which fits my needs:

    I am looking to upgrade my computer. I don't play games, but use it a lot for video encoding, using x264 as the encoding engine. A lot of graphic cards support CUDA, but x264 does not support CUDA. My question is: Will bying a high end graphic card like GeForce GTX 660 Ti or better make any significant improvement on video encoding speed compared to a cheaper card? I am planning to use an Intel i7 3930k as CPU for the job.
    Quote Quote  
  2. If you are using x264 then it won't make the least bit of difference which graphics card you use.
    Quote Quote  
  3. An i7 3930k with x264 and very fast setting is as fast as any GPU encoder (not quite as fast as Intel Quick Sync) and still delivers better quality.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Originally Posted by jagabo View Post
    An i7 3930k with x264 and very fast setting is as fast as any GPU encoder (not quite as fast as Intel Quick Sync) and still delivers better quality.
    As far as I had tested with paid video encoders, using GPU delivers faster encoding speed compared to CPU encoding but here is the result I got.

    - With GPU enabled, the quality was little unbearable than the one encoded with CPU only (GPU disabled).

    x264 is best but the resultant video has a lighting difference, i.e the brightness/contrast. I guess I need to adjust them using filters
    Quote Quote  
  5. Originally Posted by pearlblack15 View Post
    As far as I had tested with paid video encoders, using GPU delivers faster encoding speed compared to CPU encoding but here is the result I got.
    Did you select settings similar to the "veryfast" preset (or faster) in x264? Were you using some other h.264 encoder? What CPU were you using? You need a quad core or better for x264 to beat GPU encoding.

    Originally Posted by pearlblack15 View Post
    x264 is best but the resultant video has a lighting difference, i.e the brightness/contrast. I guess I need to adjust them using filters
    x264 didn't cause that. Look elsewhere.
    Quote Quote  
  6. x264 is best but the resultant video has a lighting difference, i.e the brightness/contrast.
    probably a TV vs. PC scale problem during decoding,..
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!