Hi there,
So far I just used 4:3 and did editing with Studio8, used to it and happy with it.
I just got a new DV camcorder which can capture in 16:9 format. How does that work? I thought DV was a fixed 720x576 (which is 5:4 and not 4:3 in any case...), so how can DV be 16:9?
I just recorded 16:9 to see, edited and resaved it with my 4:3 Studio8. The image on the PC looked narrowed, but comes back perfect on 16:9 TV. Am I losing resolution in the process?
Also, when I add a picture in my Studio8 movie, then render it to tape, the image is expectedly widened. Not much i can do there with Studio8 I suppose...
thx,
j
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
-
same number of pixels, they are just shaped differently. wider. and it's 4:3 no matter what you think. again it's got to do with shape and the size displayed on a tv.
--
"a lot of people are better dead" - prisoner KSC2-303 -
It's called anamorphic, the video cam records like this (note the people look tall and skinny and this is 720x480 NTSC):
You encode and author as 16:9, all this does is set a flag that it's 16:9. It doesn't change the resolution nor does it add anything to the video. The DVD player sees 16:9 flag and letterboxes the video adding black bars top and bottom which gives you this:
How you do it with Pinnacle i have no idea, also be aware that some cams (and software) will record a pseudo 16:9 where the black bars are added by the cam or software like in the second picture. You don't want that. -
thank you guys.
This means I can shoot 16:9, edit with the skinny look, and render 16:9 with no probs (no change in resolution, just the 16:9 flag that changes).
I am left with the problem of pasting photos into my video editing. The photos come in a "square pixel" format, and hence look fat when rendered along with the 16:9 movie. One work-around would be to batch-squeeze my pictures. Any idea of a tool to do that?
thx again,
j -
Originally Posted by jmwismer"Shut up Wesley!" -- Captain Jean-Luc Picard
Buy My Books -
Thank you guys, IrfanView or FastStone Photo Resizer look like they should do the job. None propose a 4:3 to 16:9 conversion. Excuse my ignorance, but what scaling shall I provide to do the trick?
Here a try:
4:3 is 1.33333
16:9 is 1.77777
so if I want to compress my images to fake a 16:9 capture, I have to do a horizontal compression to 1.3333/1.7777 which is 75%, correct?
Similar Threads
-
/shrug - Now What Don't I Understand
By macbuz in forum MacReplies: 2Last Post: 12th Jan 2009, 17:21 -
how to understand what settings to use for capturing
By Fking in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 6Last Post: 15th May 2008, 18:50 -
dvd writer do not understand ISO9660 UDF format?
By rancid in forum Authoring (DVD)Replies: 17Last Post: 20th Jan 2008, 17:42 -
I'd like to understand How to use avisynth/AvsEdit
By Hittz in forum Video ConversionReplies: 5Last Post: 9th Sep 2007, 21:25 -
trying to understand kbps??
By icucmerc in forum Video ConversionReplies: 6Last Post: 4th Aug 2007, 23:58