Which set offers better quality of MPEG capturing? ATI All-In-Wonders or Hauppauge WinTV's?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
-
About the same.
I think Hauppauge can be a little softer on the 352x480 than it should be, but it's otherwise fine.
ATI can sometimes have a little more noise. It also requires a tad more bitrate than the Hauppage to get similar quality, maybe 500k or so, not much.
I'm sure you'd be happy with either of them. I prefer the ATI because it does AVI, and the VideoSoap filters can be useful.Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
FAQs: Best Blank Discs • Best TBCs • Best VCRs for capture • Restore VHS -
...and I prefer Hauppage, as it's 100% hardware encoding (your CPU is free for other tasks whilke capturing) as opposed to ATI's "hardware assisted" encoding.
/Mats
Similar Threads
-
Hauppauge HD PVR
By Susan_T in forum Video Streaming DownloadingReplies: 1Last Post: 21st Nov 2011, 20:06 -
Hauppauge HD PVR
By Susan_T in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 1Last Post: 21st Nov 2011, 15:20 -
Hauppauge compatibility
By dfisher052 in forum ComputerReplies: 12Last Post: 29th Jan 2011, 01:59 -
Hauppauge WinTV PVR-150 ($60) vs. ATI TV Tuner 650 ($100)
By RoganSarine in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 2Last Post: 13th Dec 2007, 02:48 -
Hauppauge and ATI in same PC
By chris1379 in forum Media Center PC / MediaCentersReplies: 2Last Post: 13th Jun 2007, 20:40