I am using Windows XP, an ATI all in one wondercard 9800 Pro and an AMD Athelon 2000+, with 512 GB Ram.
After capturing about 1.5 hours I render the program using TMPEGnc 3.0 XP then I use TMPEGnc DVD Author before burning.
When I render the program using TMPEGnc 3XP it takes about 9 hours regardless of setting the output to DVD NTSC or XDVD NTSC. In both cases I am using VBR and I suspect I could save some time with CBR with the corresponding loss in quality.
The approx 9 hours to render seems excessive, is this the case?
Am I doing somthing wrong?
When I use Ulead Movie Factory 2 to render the same program it seems to only take about an hour. Is the output that much worse because it is so much quicker? I can see a difference but the source I am using is not good and it may be my imagination. Thanks
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
-
Deja Vu?
Read my reply on that other BBS where you posted exactly the same thingCheers, Jim
My DVDLab Guides
Similar Threads
-
No Audio With Render
By wingspar in forum EditingReplies: 1Last Post: 8th Oct 2011, 16:22 -
What is better to render with?
By ingeborgdot in forum EditingReplies: 8Last Post: 11th Sep 2011, 12:10 -
sync without render?
By mrjoetoff in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 0Last Post: 23rd Aug 2009, 10:04 -
What quality do I render to?
By seven1970 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 6Last Post: 22nd Feb 2009, 15:59 -
capture without having to render
By sfischer in forum MacReplies: 1Last Post: 6th Mar 2008, 12:09