VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    I got a question ...

    Has telecine been performed in all NTSC DVD movies or is it true 24p? Im asking because once i converted a small clip from a 3ivx 4.5 file to a quicktime DV file and I checked the "telecine" and it turned out like crap. So id like to know what is really "true" 24p.
    Quote Quote  
  2. Always Watching guns1inger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Miskatonic U
    Search Comp PM
    The framerate for film is 24 fps, and film is, of course, progressive. Most film transfers done by studios will be true conversions, with 2:3 pulldown applied for playback on non-progressive TVs.
    Read my blog here.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    2:3 pulldown? I thought to go from 24p film to 60i NTSC , 3:2 pulldown is needed. And 3:2 pulldown is also called "telecine" while 2:3 pulldown is also called inverse telecine am I right?
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Never mind.. i read this on the site:

    2:3 pulldown
    The process of converting 24-frame-per-second film to video by repeating one film frame as three fields, then the next film frame as two fields



    3:2 pulldown
    An uncommon variation of 2-3 pulldown, where the first film frame is repeated for 3 fields instead of two. Most people mean 2:3 pulldown when they say 3:2 pulldown.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Always Watching guns1inger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Miskatonic U
    Search Comp PM
    Apologies - typo. Doesn't change the fact that most major studio transfers are 24p, and will playback that way on a progressive set through a progressive capable player.
    Read my blog here.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    no you were right, it wasn't a typo. Basically i read that 2:3 pulldown is the proper way to represent the telecine process and 3:2 is basically the same thing except its wrong. People mistake telecine for saying its 3:2 instead of 2:3.

    Inverse telecine is referred to as 2:3 correction.

    I tested inverse telecine method by capturing a ppv movie clip to my DV camcorder, and then captured it on my computer. I then took the raw DV file which had interlacing artifacts and was 29.97fps.. and performed inverse telecine (IVTC) and the interlacing artifacts disappeared while returning to the original frame rate of 24 and progressive.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Always Watching guns1inger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Miskatonic U
    Search Comp PM
    Can you post some before and after stills ?
    This sounds interesting.
    Read my blog here.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    well its kinda hard with stills but here is an example of the interlacing artifacts. I captured Dish Network's DVB MPEG-2 satellite stream from their PPV channel directly to my MiniDV camera using and S-video cable. Basically the movie that was being broadcast has already had a 2:3 pulldown performed (telecine) and is ready to playback on a NTSC TV. i then captured it into my camcorder and transfered it to the computer. Now in order to get the 29.97 fps, interlaced dv file to its original 24 frames/sec, and progessive form, and Inverse telecine was performed by me using Cleaner 6 for OS X. The end result looked fantastic. (5 frames under here)





    Quote Quote  
  9. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    these frames are actually the original, already telecined footage to show how 24p was squeezed to 60i. I did not put frames up for the inverse telecine.. which simply had no interlacing artifacts and was true 24p.
    Quote Quote  
  10. I'm a MEGA Super Moderator Baldrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Sweden
    Search Comp PM
    Please try post in correct forum, this is no DVD Authoring. Moving you.
    Quote Quote  
  11. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    hells if i know what the "correct" forum is.. there is too many.
    Quote Quote  
  12. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    Your frame 3 and 4 clearly show the mixed field 1 field 2 from opposite frames. The greater the motion the more obvious the field tear. It's not a bad thing if the DVD player is your target. A good progressive DVD player will remove 3:2 (2:3) and create the progressive 24fps and then convert that to 60 frames per second 480p.

    2:3 3:2 terminology may be commom in some circles but in the TV industry 3:2 is used for both. "Reverse 3:2" is also used refering to removal of 3:2.

    So many ways to say the same thing.

    One of the best written summaries of how 24fps material is encoded to DVD and how a progressive DVD player works is here. Enjoy.

    WHAT THE HECK IS 3:2 PULLDOWN? by Dan Ramer
    http://www.dvdfile.com/news/special_report/production_a_z/3_2_pulldown.htm
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!