VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. Member yoda313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Animus
    Search Comp PM
    Hello,
    I was wondering, why is demultiplexing, muxing, and other tech terms used instead of cutting, joining, etc???

    My personal guess is it's part of the programming world's way to sound loftier and more intelligent than other people. It's just a fancy way to say cut, join, etc.. That doesn't sound as cool as Muxing though, hmm?

    Just a pet pieve. It really intimidates newbies, it seems. Though I've started using the term it's kind of silly.

    Kevin.

    P.S. No real insult intended to programmers. Just a little complaint
    Donatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw?
    Quote Quote  
  2. Master of Time & Space Capmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Denver, CO United States
    Search Comp PM
    Multiplexing doesn't mean the same thing as "joining". In the electronics world, multiplexing is a way of making a few wires behave like many more wires. Send changing data with a corresponding changing address and you can program hardware at the other end that only listens for its own address. One set of wires can then send different instructions to different hardware. That's multiplexing.

    In video, multiplexing means intertwining audio and video. Demultiplexing, or demuxing for short, means separating the audio and video. Joining only means adding one thing onto the end of another.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member yoda313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Animus
    Search Comp PM
    Hello,
    Thanks Capmaster. Well maybe its more involved than I thought. It just seemed like overkill to me. But things are made overcomplicated a lot of times (like marketing gimmicks and stuff). Thanks again.
    Kevin
    Donatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw?
    Quote Quote  
  4. Master of Time & Space Capmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Denver, CO United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by yoda313
    Hello,
    Thanks Capmaster. Well maybe its more involved than I thought. It just seemed like overkill to me. But things are made overcomplicated a lot of times (like marketing gimmicks and stuff). Thanks again.
    Kevin
    NP. Like you it's a pet peeve of mine when someone tries to make something technical sounding and goes over the top. I used to cringe in some of the TNG episodes, and other movies with a lot of tech stuff.

    In this case it's a real term though. I haven't seen too much BS in this hobby
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member yoda313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Animus
    Search Comp PM
    Hello,
    Capmaster-I used to cringe in some of the TNG episodes, and other movies with a lot of tech stuff.
    Oh come on, I love THAT type of technobabble. It's when it comes to stuff regular people have to tackle that it can be cumbersome. I'm just glad some terms actually MEAN something. Thanks again.
    Kevin
    Donatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw?
    Quote Quote  
  6. Master of Time & Space Capmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Denver, CO United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by yoda313
    Hello,
    Capmaster-I used to cringe in some of the TNG episodes, and other movies with a lot of tech stuff.
    Oh come on, I love THAT type of technobabble. It's when it comes to stuff regular people have to tackle that it can be cumbersome. I'm just glad some terms actually MEAN something. Thanks again.
    Kevin
    Entertaining, yeah. That's why I'm a ST addict. It bothers me when I see the discontinuity, for example, when they have no way to protect Geordy from something as simple as overloading his synapses (TNG episode "Interface"), yet they treat it as an everyday thing when they discover a way to time-travel at will (movie First Contact), yet there is no mention or repeat of that stunt in Nemesis? WTF?
    Quote Quote  
  7. Knew It All Doramius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    If only I knew
    Search Comp PM
    We're just not at that time period. We think nothing of space travel and yet, we still have traffic problems here on earth. Old movies give the impression that traffic problems would have been solved before we tried traveling to another planet, and that peace and harmony would be among the world. In contrast, we got people making personal space craft to get the heck off the planet with traffic congestion.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Master of Time & Space Capmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Denver, CO United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by Doramius
    We're just not at that time period. We think nothing of space travel and yet, we still have traffic problems here on earth. Old movies give the impression that traffic problems would have been solved before we tried traveling to another planet, and that peace and harmony would be among the world. In contrast, we got people making personal space craft to get the heck off the planet with traffic congestion.
    When I was a kid I was sure that by now we'd be getting around on conveyor belts and getting our daily nutrition from a pill. I believed George Orwell
    Quote Quote  
  9. Originally Posted by Capmaster
    Originally Posted by yoda313
    Hello,
    Capmaster-I used to cringe in some of the TNG episodes, and other movies with a lot of tech stuff.
    Oh come on, I love THAT type of technobabble. It's when it comes to stuff regular people have to tackle that it can be cumbersome. I'm just glad some terms actually MEAN something. Thanks again.
    Kevin
    Entertaining, yeah. That's why I'm a ST addict. It bothers me when I see the discontinuity, for example, when they have no way to protect Geordy from something as simple as overloading his synapses (TNG episode "Interface"), yet they treat it as an everyday thing when they discover a way to time-travel at will (movie First Contact), yet there is no mention or repeat of that stunt in Nemesis? WTF?
    Damn, and I thought I was the only one that contemplated the Star Trek universe to that level...

    Wow.
    Quote Quote  
  10. I'm a Super Moderator johns0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    canada
    Search Comp PM
    I rather they use tech talk then say thingmabob or doohickie,that would make me really cringe.
    I think,therefore i am a hamster.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!