VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Search Comp PM
    I've read somewhere that when authoring basic VCDs not to worry about de-interlacing if the final product will be shown on a TV, and that's fine with me.

    The problem is, however, for another project I'm working on, I simply CANNOT work with interlaced video, as I am going to add special effects to the video, and if the video was interlaced, it would be near impossible to do special effects efficiently.

    Is there any way to capture video without it interlacing via Premiere 6.5. I've already selected upper field first. This is what I get now when I capture...



    I'm using a Sony DCR-TRV33E via Firewire/IEEE1394.

    What I want is to have totally uncompressed video to edit with, so I can add special effects via After Effects, without losing video quality, and have it outputted at the end onto DVD. Also, if it is non-interlaced, and I output onto DVD, will it view correctly on TV?

    Thanks a lot guys.
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Oskeeweewee Ontario
    Search Comp PM
    I'm not even gonna pick apart what you've typed..

    Rule of thumb...For DVD output, don't deinterlace, or remove a field.

    That's the beauty of Mpeg2. It supports interlacing, much like your TV set does..If you deinterlace, or remove a field, like in VCD's, then you're gonna be missing out on half your information...

    This shouldn't have anything to do with the special effects that you add..Depending on your project settings, Premiere knows that when you add an effect, to keep it consistent, in regards to field order, and compression....

    http://www.lukesvideo.com/
    http://www.100fps.com/

    Have a deep and meaningfull read. Good luck!!
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Uranus
    Search Comp PM
    I simply CANNOT work with interlaced video
    You are in throuble then.
    You will have to get a new camera or go to extreme lengths
    to get progressive frames.

    Do read the link that pijetro provided . It's very instructive.

    ...also ... quit shaking the camera
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Search Comp PM
    This shouldn't have anything to do with the special effects that you add
    The problem is (take the pic for example), if i was to rotoscope or something similar to rotoscoping, how would you do it? I know HOW to do it, but how do you do it on a frame with 4 images of the same object?

    For DVD output, don't deinterlace, or remove a field
    So, I should always keep to Upper Field First, right?

    ...also ... quit shaking the camera
    Umm....the whole point is that I need fast actions for the project I'm about to start working on...going slow isn't an option.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    dv from a camcorder will be bottom field first.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    You can not capture interlaced video as non-interlaced. There are ways to convert it to non-interlaced. I dont know how interlaced video interacts with adobe after effects but you might wanna check the adobe forums for more info on this.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!