VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. As tested, a Cybercom 4931 dvd-player reads a dvd-video burned on a +RW-disc and -R disc: but not on a +R disc.

    A firmware update is not available for the Cybercom (which seems to a Medion 4560, which is in fact produced by Oritron, ...).

    I find it rather strange that a +RW is no problem, but a +R isn't: does anyone have any idea what the difference may be between those two ?

    The +R(W) consortium is saying: 'A DVD+R/+RW video recorder will always record DVD+R discs with DVD-ROM bitsettings, for maximum compatibility.'

    So what might be the difference and a solution in order to use a +R ?

    P.S.
    Changing the bitstteing seems no solution either, as I'm using a NEC ND1300A:"For now, the tools (to change the bitsetting) will not work with some drives, particularly if they are not based on a Ricoh engine, such as the drives build by NEC."
    Quote Quote  
  2. I read somewhere else about the type of dye used in various media and for some strange technical reason (reflectivity) RW media are generally more compatible with stuff ...power......weak........cannot continue....shutdown imminent........
    Corned beef is now made to a higher standard than at any time in history.
    The electronic components of the power part adopted a lot of Rubycons.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Normal CDs can not be modified -- they are read-only devices. A CD-R disc needs to allow the drive to write data onto the disc. For a CD-R disk to work, there must be a way for a laser to create a non-reflective area on the disc.
    A CD-R disc therefore has an extra layer that the laser can modify. This extra layer is a greenish dye. In a normal CD, you have a plastic substrate covered with a reflective aluminum or gold layer. In a CD-R, you have a plastic substrate, a dye layer and a reflective gold layer. On a new CD-R disc, the entire surface of the disc is reflective -- the laser can shine through the dye and reflect off the gold layer.

    Dye seems not to be an issue concerning the difference ...

    (as long as a re-boot is possible)
    Quote Quote  
  4. Originally Posted by yungoso
    I find it rather strange that a +RW is no problem, but a +R isn't: does anyone have any idea what the difference may be between those two ?
    DVD+RW came out a year before DVD+R. Your player's firmware was created between them.

    Whats the real question?
    You stop me again whilst I'm walking and I'll cut your fv<king Jacob's off.
    Quote Quote  
  5. My real question, as written:

    So what might be the difference and a solution in order to use a +R ?

    Ok: the firmware was created in between and an upgrade is not possible.
    Thanks.

    So, apparently, it can be concluded that there's no way that I can burn a +R in a way that the DVD-player treats it like a +RW (like the mentionned bitsetting-option).
    Quote Quote  
  6. The Nec ND1300 is a dual format drive is it not?

    Why would you keep pushing +R when as you said the player supports -R that you are able to burn?
    You stop me again whilst I'm walking and I'll cut your fv<king Jacob's off.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Answering a question with a question might be a way to say: I don't have an answer.

    OK: just say so.

    Not that I'm pushing +R, as you are suggesting, I simply do see a better availability of (good) +R-discs ... So if there is a possibility, I would prefer to use them.

    Wondering who is pushing things.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!