I've had too many coasters to continue to pay $3.00 for a DVD-/+R. I have seen some people say that ACCU work great, I have also seen people say Ritek. Which of the two are better? I know they both apparently work with the Sony Dru500a, so I'm just curious as to which ones are better. Also, have most people purchased the (-) or (+) format with either, and what burning software seems to work with Accu or Ritek? Thanks in advance for any info on this.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12
-
-
My Accus burned ok but when I played them back the video would pixelate, freeze, and skip in certain spots. I've since gone back to Memorex DVD+R for $2.00 each at BestBuy. These are the cheapest "name brand" that I can find at the moment (they are actually cheaper than the Ritek) and there's no shipping hassle.
-
Originally Posted by rma155
Every single one of them failed to burn on my Sony. -
Yes, the Memorex DVD-R fails the burn (even with RecordNow). I have good luck with most "name brand" DVD+R. The only DVD-R that has worked for me is Sony and TDK so far. I haven't tried the Ritek DVD+R but the Memorex DVD+R is cheaper in bulk. I'm going over to BestBuy now to buy the 50 pack for $99.
-
I only use ACCU in my Sony 500-UL. No coasters, after 50+ burns. Only a buck each on the net.
I did the same Memorex mistake. 2 coasters.
Fujifilm is cheaply made junk - stay away! (Best Buy) -
Sony makes it a point on their website that DVD-R needs to be "DVD-R General V2.0". I notice that some of the discs have this in their description while others don't. In particular, neither the ACCU or the Ritek do (meritline.com). The Meritline house brand does, but they are more expensive.
Anybody know what V2.0 means? Is it important? I wish I could use the ACCUs. Maybe I just got a bad batch. All 25 were bad. -
Has anyone had success with ACCU and not had pixelation or freezing? I'm wondering if it is your standalone RMA155. Have you tried those ACCU'S you burned in your DVD ROM? If so, is the pixelation there as well? I thought I read a couple of posts with people who used the Sony DRU500a and ACCU's and they played flawless. If anyone else has, please let me know, because I would like to order some.
-
Originally Posted by rma155
I saw someone post that even though the DVD+Rs only burn at 2.4x that they still took less time to burn than the DVD-Rs at 4x. Is this true? How long does it take to burn a DVD-R at 4x as opposed to a DVD+R at 2.4x?
Thanks! -
It turns out that all my ACCUs - every single one - play fine on my DVD-ROMs (SONYs). They don't play well on my DVD Players (Samsungs) - darn it.
-
Originally Posted by rma155
Just make sure you buy 'DVD-R for General' as opposed to 'for Authoring'. The latter is only for one specific (and expensive) 'authoring' drive.
Similar Threads
-
Where Are these Ritek CD-Rs Made???
By NBK2 in forum MediaReplies: 19Last Post: 19th Aug 2010, 13:32 -
Ritek: NEVER EVER AGAIN
By mrlar2 in forum MediaReplies: 50Last Post: 15th Aug 2007, 03:13 -
Ritek CD-R White Printable Quality
By mmbetz in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 4Last Post: 18th Jul 2007, 20:32 -
Office Depot brand dvd-r/ Ritek seconds?
By dnix71 in forum MediaReplies: 5Last Post: 31st May 2007, 19:15 -
Ritek Ridata DVD-R 4X G04 where or better?
By Illicious in forum MediaReplies: 8Last Post: 15th May 2007, 10:41