VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. I have a "wonderful" pentium 1 232 mhz...and my brother said I can basically forget converting an .avi to .mpg then burning it. Suposedly the problems I had converting an avi (it made the movie go from 1 hour 15 minutes to 3 hours of nothing) were all the fault of my cpu. He also said I couldnt get a working gba emulater, but I did. So are they really that much of crap?
    Quote Quote  
  2. Originally Posted by CrystalSuicune
    I have a "wonderful" pentium 1 232 mhz...and my brother said I can basically forget converting an .avi to .mpg then burning it. Suposedly the problems I had converting an avi (it made the movie go from 1 hour 15 minutes to 3 hours of nothing) were all the fault of my cpu. He also said I couldnt get a working gba emulater, but I did. So are they really that much of crap?
    A Pentium 233 is pretty weak dude. And that's coming from a guy that only has a celeron 366 (@433). Not just because of the number either. I think that is still based on the old socket-7 form factor? I use my computer solely for the use of capping and converting and it takes about 5-1/2 hours for every 1 hour for VCD and about 10 hours per hour if I go SVCD. If you have an ATX case, you may be able to upgrade your motherboard and chip relatively cheaply and get yourself into the low end of the ball game (with me)....
    Quote Quote  
  3. I only have a Celeron 400 and it suits me perfectly fine for most of the tasks I want to do. Sure it takes 8-10 hours to convert an AVI to an SVCD but all I do is leave it on over night.

    Moral of the story= If it does the stuff you want in a time you can accept than it doesnt need changing
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    canada
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by pacmania_2001

    Moral of the story= If it does the stuff you want in a time you can accept than it doesnt need changing
    i agree
    Quote Quote  
  5. No Longer Mod tgpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    The South Side
    Search Comp PM
    I'm perfectly happy with my 450mhz Mac. It takes a little longer than the newer G4s, but I can just as easily encode over night.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member zzyzzx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Baltimore, MD USA
    Search Comp PM
    When my 450Mhz system went up in smoke (literally) my new MB and CPU are also Socket 7 variety with a 500Mhz AMD processor. If I had to it again now I'd probably get a used Baby-AT MB/CPU cheap off eBay and keep on using my vintage 1994 AT style case. I can leave my computer on overnight all I want.
    Quote Quote  
  7. I think I read somewhere that if a processor could not execute enough filter comands at once then the actuall encoding degrades
    so the slower processor would produce a worse video than a fast one
    Quote Quote  
  8. That doesn't sound right...

    Except possibly for real-time encoders.

    For software based encoders, a slow CPU will not affect the quality. It'll just take a lot longer to get there.

    Regards.
    Michael Tam
    w: Morsels of Evidence
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!