VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 23 of 23
  1. The film is a British one with a North American DVD release.
    It's widescreen letterbox meant for 4:3 fullscreen displays.
    The PAR flag is set to 8/9, making the 720x480 display at 720x540 or 640x480 (or 4:3)
    but it looks wrong to my eye. Squashed and skinny.
    I've reset the flag to PAR 1 forcing the display to 720x480 (or 3:2)
    and it looks better to my eye.

    Could I get a second opinion?
    Screenshots attached
    DVD's PAR 8/9 versus Resetting PAR to 1

    For what it's worth, IMDB lists in their technical section that this film was shot in AR 2.35
    Image Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Letterbox-DVD-PAR-8x9.png
Views:	21
Size:	276.8 KB
ID:	86643  

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Letterbox-DVD-after-setting-PAR-to-1x1-instead.png
Views:	22
Size:	238.2 KB
ID:	86644  

    Last edited by mwesten; 18th Apr 2025 at 21:45.
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Australia-PAL Land
    Search Comp PM
    720x480 is better. The active picture area for that is 2.2:1, although I think that even that is still too skinny. The active picture stretched out to 2.35:1 looks the most realistic to me.

    What we don't know is if they cropped a bit off the sides to make it fit better. Certainly though, the 720:540 version is definitely not right.
    Image Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	1270-540 2.35to1.jpeg
Views:	10
Size:	387.5 KB
ID:	86645  

    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Australia-PAL Land
    Search Comp PM
    And, of course, not seeing the wood for the trees, the clock gives it away!
    Quote Quote  
  4. The exposed open matte on the sides leads me to believe it likely received no crops there, but that's merely an assumption, there could be other reasons it's like that.
    What I'm thinking of doing is conservatively cropping 7 left, 5 right, 78 top, 82 bottom
    which leaves a 708x320 active picture, which at PAR 1 is DAR 2.2125
    Then maybe a free resize of the vertical from 320 down to in the neighborhood of 300, just as one example, would result in DAR 2.36
    Image Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Letterbox-DVD-after-cropping_and_resizing.png
Views:	13
Size:	628.2 KB
ID:	86646  

    Quote Quote  
  5. Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Australia-PAL Land
    Search Comp PM
    IMO, it's definitely 2.35:1 from the clock.

    I'd just crop all the black stuff off and resize to 2.35:1.
    Quote Quote  
  6. With a conservative crop (grey trim and top stripe uncropped), and width resized to 752,
    I get 752x320 which exactly divides into 2.35
    Without knowing exactly how the picture was framed and conformed to the DVD,
    this is perhaps as true as I can get it while also conforming to divisibility rules of 4, 8, and 16
    Image Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Letterbox-DVD-final-crop-and-resize.png
Views:	9
Size:	272.3 KB
ID:	86647  

    Quote Quote  
  7. Originally Posted by mwesten View Post
    It's widescreen letterbox meant for 4:3 fullscreen displays.
    The PAR flag is set to 8/9, making the 720x480 display at 720x540 or 640x480 (or 4:3)
    but it looks wrong to my eye ....... DVD's PAR 8/9 versus Resetting PAR to 1
    You are starting with wrong assumptions upfront:
    DVD does not specify the PAR. So nobody can "set" a PAR flag to 8/9. You won't find a PAR flag on the DVD. DVD specifies the DAR (Display Aspect Ratio) only, which can be 4:3 or 16:9. The DAR is found in the .IFO of the DVD as instruction for the player how to play it. There is however an exeption: DVD also allow a PAR 1:1, although I have NEVER seen it in practice, neither in PAL nor in NTSC DVD world.
    Your movie seems to be 2.35:1 as stated and supported by the circular clock. You may want to upload a snippet of the .vob (few seconds) to see what it really is.
    Maybe what you have/discuss is not the original DVD source but a rip which was wrongly processed?
    Last edited by Sharc; 19th Apr 2025 at 01:53.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Originally Posted by Sharc View Post
    Originally Posted by mwesten View Post
    It's widescreen letterbox meant for 4:3 fullscreen displays.
    The PAR flag is set to 8/9, making the 720x480 display at 720x540 or 640x480 (or 4:3)
    but it looks wrong to my eye ....... DVD's PAR 8/9 versus Resetting PAR to 1
    You are starting with wrong assumptions upfront:
    DVD does not specify the PAR. So nobody can "set" a PAR flag to 8/9. You won't find a PAR flag on the DVD. DVD specifies the DAR (Display Aspect Ratio) only, which can be 4:3 or 16:9. The DAR is found in the .IFO of the DVD as instruction for the player how to play it. There is however an exeption: DVD also allow a PAR 1:1, although I have NEVER seen it in practice, neither in PAL nor in NTSC DVD world.
    Your movie seems to be 2.35:1 as stated and supported by the circular clock. You may want to upload a snippet of the .vob (few seconds) to see what it really is.
    Maybe what you have is not the original DVD source but a rip which was wrongly processed.
    I have the physical DVD in my hands.
    8/9 is the PAR reported in mediainfo after MakeMKV processing.
    So more precisely speaking it calculated the PAR based on the DAR and storage dimensions?
    either way... I'm not looking to get entangled in semantics over that.
    Playback from my computer's disc drive is 4:3 letterbox, for an active picture playback of roughly 1.96:1
    Last edited by mwesten; 19th Apr 2025 at 02:12.
    Quote Quote  
  9. Originally Posted by mwesten View Post
    8/9 is the PAR reported in mediainfo after MakeMKV processing.
    So more precisely speaking it calculated the PAR based on the DAR and storage dimensions?
    MediaInfo and MakeMKV rip/processing as the root of the confusion and mess - as often. I would be surprised if the DVD had been incorrectly authored (the title of your post), but who knows? How does the DVD look when you play it back with a DVD player on your TV?
    Last edited by Sharc; 19th Apr 2025 at 02:41.
    Quote Quote  
  10. Originally Posted by Sharc View Post
    How does the DVD look when you play it back with a DVD player on your TV?
    In normal mode on my widescreen TV, it's a windowboxed presentation with an effective display picture of around 1.90625 (No screencap ability so I used a yard stick)
    Quote Quote  
  11. Originally Posted by mwesten View Post
    Originally Posted by Sharc View Post
    How does the DVD look when you play it back with a DVD player on your TV?
    In normal mode on my widescreen TV, it's a windowboxed presentation with an effective display picture of around 1.90625 (No screencap ability so I used a yard stick)
    Strange indeed. But impossible to comment further without a snippet of the original .VOB.
    Quote Quote  
  12. British films typically require PAR 16/15 to yield a 4:3 display (with sources using 720x576 storage dimensions)
    However when I apply that PAR 16/15 to this 720x480 source instead of PAR 8/9, the DAR begins looking A LOT closer to correct.
    Screenshots below illustrate this... the result is an effective DAR of 2.3625

    And since it is a British film... you have to wonder if the North American release got things confused in exactly this way... by applying PAR 8/9 standards to a source which required PAR 16/15
    Image Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	PAR-16x15.png
Views:	4
Size:	1.06 MB
ID:	86648  

    Click image for larger version

Name:	PAR-16x15-active-picture-dimensions.png
Views:	3
Size:	1.06 MB
ID:	86649  

    Last edited by mwesten; 19th Apr 2025 at 03:33.
    Quote Quote  
  13. Yep. I came to much the same conclusion:
    If one converts the active picture (~704x320) of your rip from PAR 16/15 to square pixels the active picture becomes 751x320 which is AR=2.347.
    So they messed it up, (or something went wrong withe the .vob ripping).

    Edit:
    the "maths": 704/320x16/15=2.347
    Last edited by Sharc; 19th Apr 2025 at 05:38.
    Quote Quote  
  14. Yep yep yep.
    Here's the result of an encode using 16/15 PAR correction and zealous cropping.
    I found a scene with a straight-on view of a mason jar lid... it's nearly a perfect circle.

    So now I'm fairly confident it's meant to be a letterbox display of 16:10 rather than 4:3
    (720/480)x(16/15)=1.6
    720x(16/15)=768
    768/480=1.6
    Image Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	vlcsnap-2025-04-19-03h24m45s937.png
Views:	11
Size:	299.8 KB
ID:	86650  

    Last edited by mwesten; 19th Apr 2025 at 05:46.
    Quote Quote  
  15. Yes. But unfortunately - whatever they meant - DVD only knows 16:9. So they won't play it undistorted. It needs to be fixed.
    (Software players are more flexible of course).
    Last edited by Sharc; 19th Apr 2025 at 06:15.
    Quote Quote  
  16. Yes the only viable option is a software player or a re-encode (which then also requires a software player to playback anyways)
    DVD players and TVs can only display it too skinny or too wide, with nothing inbetween.
    The 16x9 stretch option plays back the active picture at around DAR 2.67
    Quote Quote  
  17. Correct. The source is flawed. Just not clear to me where in the workflow the flaw was introduced.
    You could of course crop and re-encode with the correct ratios and then author a new DVD from it which standard DVD players will play correctly.
    Quote Quote  
  18. Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Australia-PAL Land
    Search Comp PM
    a re-encode (which then also requires a software player to playback anyways)
    DVD players and TVs can only display it too skinny or too wide, with nothing inbetween.
    16-9 DVD plays nicely on a hardware DVD player.

    ISO (not allowed to upload ISOs to the forum):
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ju0qHcxzz2BIPkUgeEmZsEFBPTuODOMt/view?usp=sharing
    Quote Quote  
  19. Originally Posted by Alwyn View Post
    a re-encode (which then also requires a software player to playback anyways)
    DVD players and TVs can only display it too skinny or too wide, with nothing inbetween.
    16-9 DVD plays nicely on a hardware DVD player.

    ISO (not allowed to upload ISOs to the forum):
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ju0qHcxzz2BIPkUgeEmZsEFBPTuODOMt/view?usp=sharing
    Sure, but the OP's player might not be able to play PAL DVDs ....
    Quote Quote  
  20. Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Australia-PAL Land
    Search Comp PM
    Play it in VLC to see what it looks like on a DVD.
    Quote Quote  
  21. My interest is just in encoding an H.264 codec file to correct specifications.
    Rarely do I run into an aspect ratio issue as wonky as this one.
    Quote Quote  
  22. @ Alwyn,
    You can put an .ISO in a .Zip file .
    It just took a few seconds with 7-Zip
    Then upload that to this forum.
    This is the one you linked:
    Image Attached Files
    Quote Quote  
  23. Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Australia-PAL Land
    Search Comp PM
    Thanks Cholla. I'll try to remember that.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!