+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: ADVC-100/110 vs. ADVC300–are TBC,filtering sufficient enough for VHS captu

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    US
    Posts
    48

    ADVC-100/110 vs. ADVC300–are TBC,filtering sufficient enough for VHS captu

    Is ADVC-300 TBC and noise filtering issuffiencient for good VHS captruting?
    Or ADVC-100/110 and VCR with TBC/DNRplus Avisynth fiters would do the job in a more efficient way?


    Quote Quote  

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    18,919

    Re: ADVC-100/110 vs. ADVC300–are TBC,filtering sufficient enough for VHS ca

    I have an ADVC-300 but don't use its noise filtering. Its TBC is useless. I have a good VCR with both a TBC and 3D DNR, but don't use the noise filtering. I do all that in AviSYnth.

    Others may do it differently.
    Quote Quote  

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    US
    Posts
    48

    Re: ADVC-100/110 vs. ADVC300–are TBC,filtering sufficient enough for VHS ca

    manono, thanks for sharing your experience.
    I am still experimenting with my old VHS tapes (which are in a quite good condition), using ADVC-100 and JVC VCR with TBC/DNR.
    I do not like that DNR is over filtering video, making it too soft. The line sync is not bad without TBC. I rather have a bit noisier but sharper video (on my JVC VCR no way/option to use only TBC, without DNR, both Off or ON). I was even thinking of getting ADVC-300, but thanks to your advise, will stay with ADVC-100 and play with AviSynth. I keep video interlaced, playing mainly with FFT3DFilter by Fizick and NeatVideo (veeery slow).
    I would appreciate for advsing basic AviSynth filters you use.
    Quote Quote  

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    18,919

    Re: ADVC-100/110 vs. ADVC300–are TBC,filtering sufficient enough for VHS ca

    Yeah, I have a Panasonic whose DNR is separate from the TBC. I usually use DFTTest from within QTGMC (which does some filtering of its own). And you can use FFT3DFilter, which I'm also fond of, from within QTGMC. MCTemporalDenoise is said to be very good.

    I do use the ADVC-300 to set the brightness and contrast before beginning capping, but that's about all of its features I use. But more of that is also done in AviSynth later on.
    Quote Quote  

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    US
    Posts
    48

    Re: ADVC-100/110 vs. ADVC300–are TBC,filtering sufficient enough for VHS ca

    Big Thanks!
    Quote Quote  

  6. #6
    Member DB83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,081

    Re: ADVC-100/110 vs. ADVC300–are TBC,filtering sufficient enough for VHS ca

    I would not say it is 'useless'

    I have had some good results with the line tbc that this unit has - I do not own a full frame tbc.

    Quite often it will depend on the quality of the VCR and the tapes. 'Rubbish in' invariably means 'Rubbish out'
    Quote Quote  

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 27th Jun 2012, 07:04
  2. CAnopus advc-55 to use with jvc S-VHS with TBC/DNR
    By MrTemplar in forum Capturing and VCR
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 11th Dec 2010, 16:04
  3. Canopus ADVC-100 vs Canopus ADVC-110
    By tarrickb in forum Camcorders (DV/HDV/AVCHD/HD)
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 16th Oct 2010, 20:52
  4. Help the beginner time ... VHS > TBC > ADVC300 > PC
    By Tafflad in forum Restoration
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 21st Feb 2010, 16:06
  5. ADVC-110 Brightness and TBC problems
    By harmlessgryphon in forum Capturing and VCR
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 5th Jul 2008, 13:55

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts