Hello
Besides the DR-40 offering two positions for the internal microphones (X/Y or A/B), it offers some other settings when recording. Until now, I never changed the default settings, and am not sure when to use X/Y or A/B.
I use X/Y when leaving the recorder in front of a loudspeaker when recording a conference, and switch to A/B when I'm in an audience: Is this right?
Also, although I'm very satisfied about the sound quality of the recordings so far, are there useful settings I should play with?
Thank you.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
Last edited by yetanotherlogin; 11th Jan 2013 at 05:23.
-
A/B is widely spaced. This gives it greater stereo separation & phase difference. This is both a blessing and a curse. Good because the imaging will have noticeable depth, bad because you can get phase anomalies that strangely color your sound and confuse the inferred placement. Oh, and a mono mix will only accentuate the bad. This gets worse the closer the mikes are to the source.
X/Y is nearly coincident, thus it has much less phase depth (relying more on off axis volume change for depth) but also has less coloration and phase problems, including better mono compatibility.
For best sound, you should NOT be miking the speaker(s), but rather taking a mike level feed direct from the board. Speaker miking is only a last resort and has its own problems of built in distortion & coloration. Plus you have to deal with the much higher level.
In these live situations, until you know more about recording dynamics, it probably is a good idea for you to use the limiter function and possibly even (god help me i can't believe i'm even saying this) the auto level function.
Of course, if you are happy with the recording, why change, right?
Scott -
Thanks. I'll just leave the settings as-is then.
I know picking the sound from a speaker isn't ideal, but the soundboard is off-limit since I'm just a guest at a conference.
Should I use X/Y when leaving the recorder in front of the speaker and A/B when sitting in the audience? -
I'll give that a definite "PROBABLY". You could (should?) do tests and load the sound into an audio editor. Very likely, it would sound best in X/Y, but moreso if you take the X/Y dual-channel signal and mix it to mono. There will be minor phasing/combfilter effect, but shouldn't really affect the sound that much. Plus, it should be helpful as a distant sound/noise reducer. If the phasing/combfilter effect is too pronounced for your liking, you could always take just 1 channel of the 2 and duplicate it (to dual mono), for a fuller, original sound (but you will lose the distant/noise reduction option).
Scott -
Thanks. I'll try to record in mono next time and see how it goes.
-
No, NO. Do NOT record in mono, as it might not be what you're wanting and then you'd be stuck. IMO, ALWAYS record in stereo, converting to mono (if necessary) from within your DAW/Editing app.
Scott
Similar Threads
-
[Tascam DR-40] 16GB card NOK
By yetanotherlogin in forum AudioReplies: 4Last Post: 6th Dec 2012, 03:44 -
[SanDisk Sansa Clip+] Good solution to pick up loudspeaker?
By yetanotherlogin in forum AudioReplies: 2Last Post: 26th Nov 2012, 20:01 -
Best H.264 settings to target low-bandwidth audience
By AlirezaM in forum Video Streaming DownloadingReplies: 0Last Post: 19th Oct 2011, 14:45 -
Capturing Help
By Kyoji24 in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 4Last Post: 23rd Apr 2010, 06:37 -
Capturing help.
By fuseek in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 0Last Post: 6th May 2008, 09:49