VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. Member brassplyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    I see some like this where even the non-HQ video looks really good. Any idea why?


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uU1epjkUfMo&feature=channel_page
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    Looks like 4:3 standard DV def (to flash) to me. Do I need to watch the whole thing?

    The audio quality really sucks (not the performer).
    Recommends: Kiva.org - Loans that change lives.
    http://www.kiva.org/about
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member brassplyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by edDV
    Looks like 4:3 standard DV def (to flash) to me.
    Compare to this

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-lt3vVA-4I&feature=channel
    Quote Quote  
  4. Youtube re-encodes everything, so if you send a higher quality video, the end result will be higher quality

    Also, there are differences in the two; there are more scene changes (usually require IDR-frames) and motion in #2 , both these require more bitrate to look the same "quality", therefore overall quality is worse in #2 for a given bitrate limit (I think YT limits to ~500kb/s)

    Also, #2 is using an older spec and ~200kbps 320x240, #1 is using ~500kbps 480x360, so they are apples and oranges when comparing
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    #2 has been over compressed.
    Recommends: Kiva.org - Loans that change lives.
    http://www.kiva.org/about
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!