I am trying to put together a list of components for my next PC build. I am not much of a gamer on the PC (that’s what the 360 is for) but I like to do a lot with video. I plan on using Adobe Premier Elements 4, TMPGENC 4 Express, VideoReDo TV suite and possibly a few others. I don’t do a lot with HD video but I see myself getting there in the not-too-distant future.
Anyway, I am wondering which components would I get the most benefit from higher end parts? This is my parts list at this point:
MOBO - MSI P6N Platinum SLI
CPU - Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 Allendale 2.2GHz LGA 775 65W Model BX80557E4500
RAM – 2 X 1GB
VIDEO – ASUS EN7300GT SILENT/HTD/256M GeForce 7300GT 128-bit GDDR2
OS – Windows XP MCE 2005
HDD – I have a 300 GB IDE hard drive from my previous install (main drive crashed). This drive has all my data on it. I know that Adobe recommends having a separate drive for storing (and encoding to I am guessing) video. Since the board supports SATA2, would I be better off using the IDE drive as my primary OS drive or my video drive?
RAM – Would there be any encoding related performance with high performance ram or should I just stick with value ram?
VIDEO – I was thinking about stepping up to the same card in a EN7600GS chipset for $20 more, would this be worth it? I am leaning toward these Asus cards because there is no fan on them. From previous experience I am trying to limit the number of fans in the case mainly because it is one more thing to fail and have to replace. This is also one of the reasons I picked this board. I had a pinnacle studio tech tell me one time that adding a more substantial card to my old system would increase the performance of their software as it offloads some of the processing to the GPU. I am not sure if this is something that is unique to pinnacle or if most programs do this.
I know these aren’t the highest end parts, but I am also pretty limited in terms of funds (kids and all that). Just wanting to get an idea of where I will get the most bang for my buck when it comes to video encoding/rendering.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
-
Mmmmmmmm Beeeeeeeeer
-
For video encoding, you will want the fastest cpu that you can afford. Encoding is all cpu speed, the faster the cpu, the quicker the encoding.
RAM - unless you plan on OCing, you only need RAM that meets your MB specs and "budget" RAM isn't always the cheapest.
Video - for normal everyday use, this is mostly irrelevant. Any of last few generations of cards are plenty quick enough. With that said, the nVidia 8500/8600 series cards support onboard h.264 decoding. Which can be useful in a case like this, where it sounds like you are building a HTPC.Google is your Friend
Similar Threads
-
Best 'bang for buck' GPU for PowerDirector 9 Ultra?
By rocknrolla in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 4Last Post: 4th Jan 2011, 12:27 -
MKV player, best bang for my buck
By gold2040 in forum Media Center PC / MediaCentersReplies: 4Last Post: 29th Dec 2010, 12:24 -
Buck bang opinions
By kippard in forum Camcorders (DV/HDV/AVCHD/HD)Replies: 5Last Post: 25th Dec 2008, 10:26 -
best bang for buck
By fergy05 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 3Last Post: 1st Jul 2007, 22:35 -
Best Bang for Buck in Upconverting DVD Player
By golfnut in forum DVD & Blu-ray PlayersReplies: 3Last Post: 29th Jun 2007, 17:40