VideoHelp Forum




Closed Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. Member zzyzzx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Baltimore, MD USA
    Search Comp PM
    http://theinquirer.net/?article=29225

    MPAA accused of motion picture piracy


    THE MOTION PICURE ASS. of America stands accused of breaking its own piracy guidelines after it admitted making unauthorised copies of a film submitted to it for classification.



    The accuser is film director Kirby Dick who sent a copy of his documentary "This Film Is Not Yet Rated" to the MPAA back in November.

    The film is to debut at the Sundance Film Festival this Wednesday and happens to take a critical look at the workings of the MPAA.

    According to the LA Times, Mr Dick is "very upset and troubled" by the MPAA’s admission that it had made copies of his work. The Association claims the director is just making mischief to drum up publicity for the movie. Dick’s lawyer has written to the MPAA demanding explanations.

    The film puts the work of the MPAA in the spotlight, accusing it of being too hard on sex, too soft on violence and publicly unaccountable. For its part, the MPAA reckons the film-maker’s methods, allegedly involving rooting through MPAA’s members dustbins and generally following them about, were a bit underhand.

    Mr Dick says he emailed the MPAA seeking assurances that it would not make copies of the film. He now wants to know why it did so and has asked for all copies to be returned to him.

    According to the MPAA’s own website, "Manufacturing, selling, distributing or making copies of motion pictures without the consent of the copyright owner is illegal." µ

  2. Member adam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Already posted here. https://forum.videohelp.com/viewtopic.php?t=291114

    theinquirer.net is garbage. They cut and paste articles to change the facts. They blatantly lie. This story is being covered by some reputable newspapers and even though the MPAA is not necessarily in the right, it definitely is not what that article portrays. They made copies to use as evidence because they were considering filing charges for stalking against the filmmaker since he spied on MPAA employees. The police were already investigating prior to their receiving the film.

    There is a STRONG possibility that this is just a publicity stunt.

  3. Member mats.hogberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Sweden (PAL)
    Search Comp PM
    Locking this thread. Continue in the thread indicated by adam.

    /Mats




Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!