VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. 27th Sep 2005 08:57 #1
    krnjason
    krnjason is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    which one is better? am i right that 192 mp3 is better? or is 160 wma better? thnx
    Quote Quote  
  2. 27th Sep 2005 09:24 #2
    steveryan
    steveryan is offline
    Member steveryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Manchester
    Search Comp PM
    Apologies if this sounds rude but why don't you listen to both and make up your own mind?
    He's a liar and a murderer, and I say that with all due respect.
    Quote Quote  
  3. 27th Sep 2005 09:41 #3
    celtic_druid
    celtic_druid is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Search Comp PM
    For it to be valid you would need to do a proper blind test.

    All things being equal, I would go with the mp3. That said is the wma wma pro? Was the mp3 re-encoded from a 64k wma file? What mp3 encoder? Was it blade or a recent lame compile?

    If the mp3 was a 64k wma file re-encoded to 192k via blade, I would definatly go with the 160k wma file.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!