I continue to adjust the setting trying to learn more about them. I decided to compare Constant Quality (CQ) with Automatic VBR (CQ_VBR). I left the settings the same with the Quality at 65, MaxBR at 2000, and MinBR at 0. I also turned the log on so I could see better exactly what was happening.
When I looked at the log summary at the end, the GOP frames were the same (46A, 54M). The VBV was also the same (80).
What did change was the AvgBR. In CQ the average was 1227. In CQ_VBR it was 1828 resulting in a larger file size. I then looked at the individual GOPs. It seems that CQ is much more responsive using a high BR when needed and a much lower one when not.
I like the program to be more adaptive to the particular scene. I find CQ to be much more efficient than CQ_VBR.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
-
-
I reviewed the first third of GOPs in the log file. In CQ mode with my current settings the Max BR = 2052, the Min BR = 497.
This is quite a range and means the program is very responsive to sceen changes in this mode.
I think this is important in maintaining high quality with minimum file size.
Now to see if I can get 2 pass to work.
Similar Threads
-
ffmpeg rate control
By diprotic in forum Video ConversionReplies: 2Last Post: 15th Oct 2011, 22:35 -
How to achieve the maximum bit rate in variable bit rate mode ?
By Sxn in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 42Last Post: 3rd Dec 2009, 12:53 -
mpg file size smaller than expected, TMPGEnc 2.5 VBR 2-pass mode
By chipsndukes in forum Video ConversionReplies: 1Last Post: 22nd Dec 2008, 20:48 -
Selectable Output Control - MPAA's new control tactic
By akrako1 in forum Latest Video NewsReplies: 2Last Post: 7th Aug 2008, 21:05 -
Having issues with Clone Mode in Catalyst Control Center...
By Jaxel in forum ComputerReplies: 1Last Post: 25th Feb 2008, 05:08