VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    I am now almost convinced that I want to use H264 for archiving my TV shows. I have been very impressed with the quality I am receiving with DVD Fab and now Nero Recode. I however did not have much luck with SUPER. So now I have a few questions.

    1) Is there a better H264 converter than Recode that cost around $50 or less?

    2) I understand that Video Ipods can now output 640x480, since I do not have one, what would I need to do with my Recode encodes to encode them at 640x480 and make sure they would play on an Ipod down the line. Is the only thing making sure they are not over 640x480?

    Thanks for any help,
    John
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Search Comp PM
    Hello

    I have one of the new ipods (640 x 480) and also encode with Recode2 - very impressed with the results. As far as I know the only thing to watch is that the encoding bitrate does not go above 2.5Mbps. I have done a few films at 1 - 1.2Mbps which result in about a 1GB film. The results are superb.

    Thanks. eon
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member GMaq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    crash447,
    To ensure compatibility with iPods and retain a 640x480 resolution at this point in time you have to use Nero Digital in the "Standard" Profile and enable the "Quicktime Compatibility"in the Encoder Settings, As eon has already stated you need to keep the bitrate below 2500kbps, In my experience 1250kbps is sufficient for DVD sources and gives great quality even on HDTV. It is surprising that Nero is taking so long to get a 640x480 AVC/H.264 profile out there. There are other programs that will do this like "Jesterware" and freeware programs like MeGUI but there is a real learning curve and multiple applications to these ie (MeGUI, VirtualDubMod etc.), that's not to say that they don't produce equivalent results, but Nero Recode is about the best Ease of Use/Quality result MPEG-4 Software out there.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by GMaq
    crash447,
    To ensure compatibility with iPods and retain a 640x480 resolution at this point in time you have to use Nero Digital in the "Standard" Profile and enable the "Quicktime Compatibility"in the Encoder Settings, As eon has already stated you need to keep the bitrate below 2500kbps, In my experience 1250kbps is sufficient for DVD sources and gives great quality even on HDTV. It is surprising that Nero is taking so long to get a 640x480 AVC/H.264 profile out there. There are other programs that will do this like "Jesterware" and freeware programs like MeGUI but there is a real learning curve and multiple applications to these ie (MeGUI, VirtualDubMod etc.), that's not to say that they don't produce equivalent results, but Nero Recode is about the best Ease of Use/Quality result MPEG-4 Software out there.
    Is the "Standard" Profile not H.264? If not it may defeat my purpose.

    Thanks,
    John
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member GMaq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    John,
    The "Standard" Profile is NOT H.264, Nero doesn't have a H.264/AVC profile at the higher resolution of 640x480 that is iPod compatible yet, You can create files in Nero that are 640x480 using the AVC Profiles but they don't have the proper flagging to play on the iPod (yet). H.264 is great, it truly does give better quality at a lower bitrate, but bear in mind other than PC's and iPods it is not an industry standard (yet). There are no Set top players or external media players (ie DLink MediaLounge) that will handle H.264 video (yet), they will certainly be coming soon for example Apples "iTV". It's not that you can't get great quality with Nero Digital Standard, it just going to take about 15% more bitrate to get it. From what I've read the Jesterware DVD to IPod is supposed to create the 640x480 H.264 files you're looking for, and evidently the quality is great, DO NOT go the Quicktime Pro route, it is a frustrating dead end and in the Windows environment there are far better softwares to create what you want. I like yourself never could get anywhere with SUPER, Search for Jesterware DVD to iPod Converter and see what you think, I don't have it because I'm happy with Nero and Several of the Freeware apps for now. Good Luck, if you try the Jesterware let us know what you think!!
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Search Comp PM
    I downloaded the demo of the Jesterware iPod Video Suite. First impressions quite impressed. Unfortunately it does not give you any basic cropping or edit features so your video has to be the right size before the conversion. Only settings were 4:3 or 16:9. The other dissapointment was that it does not accept avisynth .avs files.

    On the plus side the quality was good and the encoding time not too bad, but that will vary from one machine spec to the other.

    Hopefully they will include some basic edit and crop features in the next release.

    Thanks. eon
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Although I don't have an iPod, I'm impressed with MeGUI. Do any iPod owners out there use it?
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member GMaq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    kevo777,
    I use MeGUI when I want have more control over resizing or aspect ratios etc, It is a very powerful package with all the supporting software apps inside, I also use the utilities in it in their own like DG Index and the Script Creator, The Audio side of it is really handy for batch conversions too. Are you using x264 at 640xXXX?? Supposedly there is a special build of MP4Box that will tag for iPod compliance at the larger resolution. I have made plenty of iPod compliant files at the old 320x240 size with MeGUI but have yet to do a 640xXXX one.
    Quote Quote  
  9. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    OK I tried the Jesterware IPOD Video Suite instead of the DVD to IPOD converter because it allowed you to put in any VOB file. I am pleased with it for the most part. The only problem I came to find is that the first file I tried seems to be interlaced which I have noticed after playing it back. The Jesterware apparently does not do any analysis and you can manually add a filter. I tried IVTC, but still got the same result. I then tried to use their deinterlace filter and it crashes.

    Now I am back to my confusion of interlaced, deinterlaced and ITVC. When I view this file on my laptop LCD I noticed it is interlaced, but on my TV I do not notice it. I know that Recode deinterlaced the same file. So now my new questions.

    1) I do not notice this interlacing problem on my Standard TV, will I later notice it on an HDTV or an IPOD?

    2) Does Recode only deinterlace and not perform IVTC?

    A little confused on where to go now.

    Thanks,
    John
    Quote Quote  
  10. Member GMaq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    John,
    Nero will detect most DVD sources as film and will not de-interlace because it "sees" the source as Film/Progressive. As for the interlaced H.264 files that Jesterware is producing the should be no problem at all on an HDTV because at this point in time most of them are 1080"i" which is interlaced, Future HDTV's will have hardware de-interlacing and will do a better job than software solutions, If viewing them on your computer then you will need to watch them in a player that will do on the fly deinterlacing, ffdshow will do this in WMP and VLC Player can do it as well, I'm not sure if Quicktime can or not, Some times you can set your Codec for Post Production options like de-blocking and de-interlacing as well.
    Quote Quote  
  11. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    GMaq,

    Thanks for the info on interlacing. That was what I was thinking, but the clarification is great. So my opinions so far on the Jesterware products are this. I like the Jesterware IPOD Video Suite better, because it lets you input any video file. They are the same price.

    Pros
    #1 Easy to use.
    #2 Pretty fast in my opinion. About an hour for a 23 minute TV Show. My XVID encodes take about 55 minutes for one pass of the same.
    #3 Easy Batching
    #4 I'm very pleased with the quality, but I am new to h.264

    Cons
    #1Very Simple
    #2 Innability to select things like target file size and it only allows a preset of certain bitrates. It jumps from around 1000kbps to 1500kbps
    #3 No two pass encoding. However I don't know if this is normal with H.264.


    Overall I was pretty impressed, however I really wish DVD Fab Platinum would add a few more features like 640x480 encoding for IPOD and batch encoding for episodic discs.

    Thanks again,
    John
    Quote Quote  
  12. Member GMaq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    John,
    Thanks for sharing the info about Jesterware, I noticed this Morning on the "New Tools" section on the Videohelp homepage that Elecard has a mobile converter application out as well, It looks like they've just added 2-Pass AVC/H.264 encoding and looks like it does batches as well, I'm going to check it out later and see what it's all about, It seemingly converts to MPEG-2 as well as AVC, might be another option - Like we need more!!!
    Quote Quote  
  13. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Search Comp PM
    I just recently purchased the Jesterware suite. Have to admit that I am very impressed with the results.

    Compared the same movie converted with Recode (Mpeg4) and Jesterware (H264) the file size was much smaller with Jesterware and the quality was far better, it was even encoded at a lower bit rate than Recode. (Recode 1250bps, Jesterware 1024bps)

    Very impressed - only down side is the time to encode to H264, but that is due to the codec and not the software.
    Quote Quote  
  14. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Search Comp PM
    Looks like it contains code from x264, mencoder, gpac amongst others. So multiple GPL breaches (no source available, custom license instead of GPL, etc.).
    Quote Quote  
  15. Originally Posted by GMaq
    It is surprising that Nero is taking so long to get a 640x480 AVC/H.264 profile out there. There are other programs that will do this like "Jesterware" and freeware programs like MeGUI but there is a real learning curve and multiple applications to these ie (MeGUI, VirtualDubMod etc.), that's not to say that they don't produce equivalent results, but Nero Recode is about the best Ease of Use/Quality result MPEG-4 Software out there.
    In my opinion it's not surprising any longer, but really getting obscene now.
    Maybe you also want to support the Petition to Nero to finally add advanced H.264 iPod Video support.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!