Comparison for mediainfo

[pensioner]

Guys,im still learning here,but althouth i have watched both videos ,i can seem to see any difference in them and the size overall is quite big.


2 500 kb/s 1808*1080 (5:3),@ 24.000 FPS.AVC (High@L4.1) (CABAC / 4 Ref Frames) total of 1.8Gb inc sound

8 000 kb/s 1796*1080 (5:3),@ 24.000 FPS.AVC (High@L4.1) (CABAC / 4 Ref Frames) total of 5.65Gb inc sound

I used "Mediainfo" to get these readings.

Is one picture superior?

Thanks all.

[ProWo]

Here is the difference in size:
2 500 kb/s vs 8 000 kb/s

Both videos should be fine.

[jagabo]

The higher bitrate video probably has a lot more low contrast, high (spacial) frequency detail, grain retention, less posterization in gradients, etc. But different encoders and/or encoder settings can make a big difference too.

[Sharc]

Assuming the same encoder the quality of the 8000 kb/s file is supposed to be better (sharpness, contrast, fine details, gradients, etc.). The difference might however not immediately jump into your eyes when watching casually. Depends on scene (motion, brightness, noise), size and resolution of TV screen etc.
You have to find your personal compromise on visual quality vs. bitrate (file size).