Hi
I have recently lost the use of borrowed analogue video camera the output of which I pumped through a capture card and edited in Studio 9. I now have to look for a digital video camera however I am confused as to the pixels I need.
On cameras I am looking at the Gross Pixels range from 800k to 2,000k.
What pixel density should I go for as a high end home user?
Or is it more complicated than that?
Many thanks in advance
Magistrum
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
-
-
most people have a 3 megapix
i have a 1 megapix (which isnt too good)
get a 4 or 5 -
hang on, digital VIDEO camera vs Digital STILL camera here.
Digital Video Camera only needs 720x576 (PAL) 0.5megapixel approx, AND does not need to have 1/2/3 megapixels. This is just for the STILL camera feature on the video camera.
If you want the Video camera to take quality Still shots as well, then the more megapixels the better, but the price rises significantly.
Value for money it is still better to buy separate Video and Still cameras."speed's just a question of money. How fast can you go?" - Mad Max, 1979 -
Max
Indeed, forget any thought of a still camera I am talking 100% digital Video.
Mag.Magistrum -
So Max we you suggesting 800k pixels is sufficient?
This was my thought which was why I asked, it occured to me that anything above 800k was just a waste. Am I correct?Magistrum -
There's a reason why professional cameras do not fool with still picture options. Megapixel CCDs are not as good at capturing light for lower resolution video. If you had one pixel in front of you and you cut that into fourths then yes you would have more pixels there but you would also have a grid between those pixels that wasn't there before. This grid that is matrixed into a NTSC or PAL signal actually introduces dark lines into the picture that wouldn't be present in a camera that was closer to having the same amount of pixels that match the resolution for the NTSC or PAL standards. Understand?Originally Posted by Magistrum
The XL1 only uses 227,000 pixel CCDs.Your miserable life is not worth the reversal of a Custer decision. -
Many thanks "Sillyname" so for me you reckon 800k would be the go?
Mag.Magistrum -
CCD size is also very important. The bigger your target, the more light you gather. Most consumer cameras out there only have 1/6" CCDs and are terrible in low light(lots of grain in the picture.) 3CCD cameras generally offer very good low light handling capabilities, although the entry level 3ccd cameras that Panasonic puts out have 3 1/6" CCDs, so low light recordings are just as bad as single CCD cameras but color handling is better. Price is the first thing I would consider, though. What can you afford?Originally Posted by MagistrumYour miserable life is not worth the reversal of a Custer decision.
-
The one I was looking at was fairly cheap at (A)$781 http://www.digitalcamerawarehouse.com.au/prod963.htm
Magistrum -
1/4" CCD plus HAD is very good. The Spot focus feature is pretty impressive, too. I believe this one is going to be touch screen driven, which you'll either love or hate.Originally Posted by MagistrumYour miserable life is not worth the reversal of a Custer decision.
Similar Threads
-
how do I convert a video that shows square pixels to no pixels?
By sxpredman in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 4Last Post: 10th Jan 2010, 03:56 -
Another question: Converting square pixels into round pixels.
By Earthling2000 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 13Last Post: 23rd Nov 2009, 11:20 -
SD Video Camera Vs. HD Movie Mode on Digital Still Camera.
By CP/M User in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 20Last Post: 20th Nov 2009, 15:57 -
Digital Camera?
By lglrgl in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 2Last Post: 23rd Jul 2007, 19:58 -
New digital camera
By bg55 in forum Off topicReplies: 17Last Post: 10th Jun 2007, 14:17



Quote