I HAVE A 800MHZ AMD
128RAMS.
WHAT HARD WARE WOULD I NEED TO UPGRADE SO MY ENCODEING BECOME FASTER. BECAUSE IT TAKE TO ENCODE A DV MOVE WITH HIGH RESOULATION AND BITRATE ABOUT 9HOURS.
THANKS
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
-
I guess, that you want to keep you settings, so the only way to make it faster, is to get more CPU power.
Changing the resolution from 720x480 to 352x480 is another option. It still looks good, and the encode process is a lot faster. -
<TABLE BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER WIDTH=85%><TR><TD><font size=-1>Quote:</font><HR size=1 color=black></TD></TR><TR><TD><FONT SIZE=-1><BLOCKQUOTE>
On 2001-07-02 12:29:00, Truman wrote:
I guess, that you want to keep you settings, so the only way to make it faster, is to get more CPU power.
Changing the resolution from 720x480 to 352x480 is another option. It still looks good, and the encode process is a lot faster.
</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD><HR size=1 color=black></TD></TR></TABLE>
720x480 is not good, it makes for a hell of alot of macroblocks, 352x480? thats whacked, is that even XVCD? use 480x480, its a bit faster than 720 -
352X480 (576 for pal) is CVD, the china's version of SVCD.
It is full compatible with SVCD
Also, 352 X 480 (576) is half DVD resolution, a dvd non commercial format, for homemade porpuses.
480X480 is NTSC SVCD with mpeg 2 or NTSV XVCD with mpeg 1.
Using 352 X 480, is in a way more compatible with homemade DVDs, in a theoritical base. Using 480 X 480 you may have more trouble in theory....
-
First, make sure that logging to file is disabled. Creating a logfile increases the encodingtime enormously.
There are also som templates for Tmpgenc out there that claim (probaly rightfully) that they produce better quality mpg's, but they are slower.
Following this reasoning, it should also be possible to tweak the original template to be a bit faster, and thus produce an mpg with lesser quality.
After that CPU speed is the key. -
hitmandj,
Thought I'd jump in too.
I agree with Truman. Use 352x480 during caps.
If you source is in good condition, that is. To me, good condition
is satalete, while cable is better than nothing, but seems to produce
more blocks/grains. If you're doing home-made videos, well, then...
you have another options (for anyone)-:
a - buy a good:
b - learn how to NOT move your video cam so much
c - stop using ZOOM while moving/panning around area
d - Lighting!! very important!! Not enought light, and you have
the grainy affect - at least in my video's they do.
I have a video cam, but not with a stabalizer. (about 3 years old)
I know that if I leave my camera on tripod most scenes come out
looking really good - nice and clear. But, I'm talking about direct
captures, not taking videos and recording to tape, and then later,
caping them to AVI.
Well, the above was my 4 cents worth.
------------------------------------
DC10+ Samples (someHauppauge
too)
Similar Threads
-
White Screen in TMPEGEnc 4.0
By barrylay in forum Video Streaming DownloadingReplies: 0Last Post: 1st May 2011, 15:09 -
TMPEGenc h.264 conversion error
By iGnight in forum Software PlayingReplies: 2Last Post: 16th Jan 2011, 10:14 -
Remove subtitles from MKV when converting with TMPEGEnc
By ikarishinji41 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 3Last Post: 10th Dec 2009, 10:21 -
TMPEGEnc DVD Author Ordinal Error
By justin81 in forum Authoring (DVD)Replies: 2Last Post: 17th Aug 2009, 20:33 -
TMPEGENC keeps closing itself because of an error
By Akhet in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 1Last Post: 14th Oct 2007, 00:38