Just wondering what, if any, advantages there would be using 64 bit Potplayer/MPC?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
-
-
Last edited by newpball; 20th Apr 2015 at 12:32.
-
The advantage is if you play H.265 video files. 64-bit H.265 decoders are faster. In case of LAV Filters its more then 50%. If your CPU strugles to decode video using 32-bit decoder it will work better with 64-bit one.
Quality is the same. -
@Detmek, Quality SHOULD be the same. Doesn't mean it is - the underlying algorithms must be the same. Some code might change (inadvertently detrimentally) after porting to 64bit space.
@newpball, which curve is that? - Your expectations? Why does development need to be "64bit ONLY"? AFA Historically, we've still got ~5-7 years to go in the transition to "all 64bit".
Scott -
64bit only is faster and far more efficient.
One would expect people active in video technology be glad and excited about that but I suppose not for your average VideoHelp member.
-
64bit is only faster when the whole system is optimized for it.
64bit is USUALLY more efficient (less seeks), unless badly coded, or a mixed-bitspace subsystem exists (still quite common).
However, 64bit imposes an equipment level burden that is higher than 32bit, so there is a penalty of sorts (including memory, $), until "everything" is above that bar.
I am glad things are going the 64bit way, but I am not so gung ho that I avoid the reality of the current situation and what that means in TCO for those transitioning.
Also, there are many data objects and computing domains that really don't benefit from going 64bit. Does your Word Processor work faster? Would anyone care if it could handle text documents larger than even 4GB? Maybe only for speedy 1000+ page re-indexing or something.
3D graphics, modeling, AI & pattern recognition (incl. voice) - that's where it will really be helpful.
It makes very much sense for video FILE FORMATS to be 64bit, but the code for the editor/player apps don't necessarily HAVE to be (though most of the good ones are already anyway).
One area that of video that should benefit is in compression, so I thoroughly welcome advances there. All while completely understanding that there will still be plenty of users who cannot or will not benefit from the (overall) change, due to economic and other pragmatic reasons. All in due time.
I'm guessing that your concept of "due time" was >5 years ago. I would certainly agree that you are "not the average Videohelp member"...
Scott
Similar Threads
-
MPC HC: 32-bit or 64-bit on Windows 7 64-bit
By flashandpan007 in forum Software PlayingReplies: 20Last Post: 22nd Jul 2016, 09:22 -
Lossless (10 Bit RGB 444) and (10 Bit YUV 422) Compression Codec's
By JasonCA in forum Video ConversionReplies: 62Last Post: 25th Dec 2014, 23:40 -
Rendering HD video Pixel Format 8-bit or 32-bit? Deinterlace Blend or None?
By c627627 in forum Authoring (Blu-ray)Replies: 8Last Post: 2nd Apr 2013, 16:27 -
64-Bit Vegas Pro 9 fails to open 64-bit UT Video Codec Pack
By Smells_Like_Feet in forum EditingReplies: 1Last Post: 2nd Oct 2011, 15:14 -
LAME 32-bit or 64-bit in EAC under Windows 7 64-bit?
By flashandpan007 in forum AudioReplies: 1Last Post: 12th Apr 2011, 09:40