VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. Member bat999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Search Comp PM
    Question withdrawn.
    Last edited by bat999; 4th Apr 2011 at 07:26. Reason: Thread went off-topic.
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    LAME how fast do you need it do it to run? On my old AMD sempronn 2-3 time faster then real time.
    Quote Quote  
  3. aBigMeanie aedipuss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    666th portal
    Search Comp PM
    dbpoweramp music converter runs about 120x here. i think they still have demo/shareware version.
    --
    "a lot of people are better dead" - prisoner KSC2-303
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    England
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by loster View Post
    LAME how fast do you need it do it to run? On my old AMD sempronn 2-3 time faster then real time.
    What encoding options are you using for it to encode at that rate?

    With the default settings, LAME on my computer (2GHz AMD Athlon 64) is encoding around 12.8x faster than real time. Even setting some of the higher quality options gives an 8x faster than real time encode.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    PA USA
    Search Comp PM
    I use dbpoweramp and it has all the speed you need. Lame does a fairly speedy job for free.
    It's not important the problem be solved, only that the blame for the mistake is assigned correctly
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by intracube View Post
    Originally Posted by loster View Post
    LAME how fast do you need it do it to run? On my old AMD sempronn 2-3 time faster then real time.
    What encoding options are you using for it to encode at that rate?

    With the default settings, LAME on my computer (2GHz AMD Athlon 64) is encoding around 12.8x faster than real time. Even setting some of the higher quality options gives an 8x faster than real time encode.
    Think its -v0 and it might by 3 or 4x now that I think about it.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!